this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
798 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2210 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The families of US soldiers who have died in the US-Israeli war against Iran are battling to ensure they receive appropriate pay and benefits for their loved ones.

Libby Klinner, a widow, wrote on social media that the US air force had deemed her ineligible for additional benefits following the death of Major Alex Klinner, her 33-year-old husband, because Congress had not officially declared war.

He was one of six crew members of a KC-135 refuelling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March while supporting US strikes against Iran.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Congress could do a lot of things that they are refusing ro do.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because Republicans have both majorities and the presidency...

Our system sucks, but it used to be functional, and can be again.

Obviously one of the first things to do once it's functional, is improve the system and put in protections to stop this from happening again.

Like, everyone complains about the electoral college, but we could just get rid of it and make the presidency a straight popular vote. But the real problem, is a president was never meant to have this much power in the first place. They're supposed to be an essentially powerless ambassador.

No real power, just the person we said can speak on our behalf in situations where there's just a single seat at a table for America

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

one of the first things to do once it's functional, is improve the system and put in protections to stop this from happening again.

Agreed, that will be critical in trying to regain any level of trust from the rest of the world.

the real problem, is a president was never meant to have this much power in the first place.

Again, you have identified another of the issues that needs fixing.

 

Between fixing those issues and repairing all the damage Trump (and his acomplices) have done, the USA has decades of work to do.

I hope they are both willing and able to put in the effort.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Between fixing those issues and repairing all the damage Trump (and his acomplices) have done, the USA has decades of work to do.

If you think that, you need to look back on how fast FDR fixed shit, and how the only thing that stopped him from doing more, is people not following up by flushing incumbents holding back progress.

Back then the average person didn't have the same outreach. Social media means people can actually organize and hear how things are going. That's why oligarchs keep gobbling up social media and flooding it with bots.

They're fucking scared.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Remind me in 6 years.

Based on the level of apathy I see from a majority of Americans, I don't expect much more than surface level changes (re-naming things back to their original names, de-trumping the white house decore etc) and little else.

I also don't trust that the Americans won't just elect another complete asshole 4 years after Trump is no longer president.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Then you don't understand how bad the party was under neoliberalism from 1991-2025, and you just assume that was actually trying or that the party went in a different direction with the 2025 chair election.

Like, if you ignore everything, obviously it's not going to make sense.

If you pay attention to what happened and what is happening, you wouldn't spend your free time shitting on the best and only chance to save the country....

Unless you were a trump supporter or neoliberal despite to depress dem turnout to stop progressives

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

despite to depress dem turnout to stop progressives

I assume that was supposed to be "desperate".

That aside, I would much prefer the Americans elect a Democrat over a Republican, but I also would prefer the democrats put forward more progressive candidates than they have been.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

but I also would prefer the democrats put forward more progressive candidates

Buddy...

Every comment you make, shows you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

The party shouldn't pick any candidate, the fact that they were was the problem.

Why the fuck don't you ask questions instead of a constant string of wrong information?

Do you think any of the shit you e been saying is actually true or how any of this works?