this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
34 points (92.5% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 22 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Ok, I was all for "let the establishment bend the knee" and get Abdul elected. It's good if we have the Democratic party funding and power behind a candidate like Abdul. Take advantage of our momentum and force the establishment to stand behind us.

But, Harris? You gotta be fucking kidding me dude. It feels like the same brain rot that had Harris campaigning with Liz Cheney.

Does anyone actually like Harris? She is basically the inverse of what Abdul represents. Who is this for? Anyone that likes her is not voting for a Republican anyway. Her presence is literally a net loss. She and the establishment Dems are literally the only one that benefits from this.

This had to be a "let her campaign with you or else" move my the establishment. And Abdul should have called their bluff.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well Gavin Newsome effectively saying he wouldn't run against Kamala sounds like theyre trying to stitch up the primaries with 1 candidste.

Its like they've learnt nothing from Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. They also learnt nothing from Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - both candidates that emerged as outside chances from a more open primary process. Stiching up the last few primaries has been disaster after disaster for the Democrats. Even Bidens win may have been at the expense of a younger candidate that may have more effectively beaten Trump and prevented 2.0.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree. And you probably understand this as well; but it needs to be said.

The Democrats aren't trying to "learn". They are doing exactly what they are supposed to do. Serve as a hole in which leftist politics goes to die.

Their goal is not to win. Their goal is to block leftist movements and collect campaign donations in return. This is just another step in that model.

The goal I have is to bring people to this understanding to spark change. Whether that is through building that understanding now through a political process that is so blatantly exposing these relationships; or other means in the future. There is a breaking point that will be reached one way or another.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The US is on the edge of full blown facsim. Whatever is true in this rhetoric, get out and vote, and yes blue no matter who. The alternative is 'the end of trans people' and whoever else they don't like.

Please be aware that there are a growing number of campaigns to get you to stay at home again. Maybe this post is part of that, maybe not. It doesn't matter. What matters is taking back control of Congress.

[–] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

You will have full blown fascism because you refuse to admit mistakes and double down on them

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago

The establishment will do anything they can to hinder anything from the left gaining power, which is why they sent Harris.