this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
39 points (91.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

26673 readers
1605 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRealShadeSlimmy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’ll see your raise, and up it:

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always see those videos where people give kids a walkman or a rotary phone and ask them to figure out what it is or how it works. I'm imagining some medieval merchant handing me an abacus and laughing because I can't figure it out.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's little endian, so the beads on the far right are used to outnumber the big endian beads at the top on the woke left. After several computations, the middle section is just gone

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tried reading about endianness once. Pretty sure it can't be dumbed down enough for my brain.

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You know how some languages write left-to-right, and some rught-to-left? Endianness is that, for numbers.

Or another analogy is dates: 2025/12/31 is big endian, 31/12/2025 is little endian. And 12/31/2025 is middle endian. Which makes no sense at all because the middle is, by definition, not an end.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I stand corrected. No idea what I was reading (several years ago), but whatever it was made it seem way more complicated. Maybe it was just an explanation from somebody who didn't know.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Likely it was being explained in the context of binary number representation as it is primarily important in computer architecture. If you're not already familiar with that then it was probably confusing explained in that context.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

You kids don't know how good you have it!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fun fact, the Romans would never have labeled their abacuses like this. It would have made calculating very difficult; they effectively worked with modern numbers in bead form, and then used the famous numeral system just to record the results.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

My buddy still has one of those in his garage.