this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
217 points (81.4% liked)

Technology

88163 readers
2798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
217
AI staff 'genuinely frightened' for humanity's future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBC (www.bbc.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
244 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm not an AI techie and I'm not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I'm having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I've heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can't really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You don't know? ... Wow. How about the error rate? Let's start there.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

No, as previously stated I am not educated on the subject almost at all. Why I framed the post as a question.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

For a start you might want to read this interview with Emily M. Bender who is a well-known critic and has much to say about what people need to understand when using these systems that are incorrectly labelled "AI":

https://spectrum.ieee.org/stochastic-parrot

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago

How ironic that she is called Bender

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Awesome. This is the exact type of thkng I was looking for. Will read soon. Thanks!