this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
194 points (80.9% liked)

Technology

88146 readers
2384 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not an AI techie and I'm not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I'm having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I've heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can't really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

„Computers are still computers are still computers and will only do what a human being programs them to do, and people are stupid. Stop assigning them agency. Say that "Microsoft created an automatic hacking program which was inadequately contained." Assign the blame CORRECTLY, because you cannot blame a computer, it's doing exactly what it's programmed to do.

OpenAI is a dead slab of metal and electrons arranged to mimic a human face and if you refuse to see that then you're as brain-dead as any chunk of silicon.“

https://chaosfem.tw/@theogrin/117299179832324445

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Thats kinda the point, they're talking about misaligned AI's. Im worried about the misaligned humans in charge of them. They're plenty dangerous because humans are operating them and creating them. Like a gun, not dangerous at all until someone picks it up with bad intentions, or lack of precautions.

[–] weps@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think computers only do what you program them to do anymore.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Not one of those so-called AI systems is an autonomous entity. Every one of these machine learning systems could be regulated, slowed down, or turned off. If a responsible human being was there to do it. Those CEOs simply refuse to take responsibility.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Based on what? I have seen no evidence to the contrary

[–] weps@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

emergent behaviour and microscopic differences in huge amounts of parallel computations

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Emergent behavior meaning what?

Which “microscopic” differences?

[–] weps@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, Socrates

look for "emergent behaviour in computers" and specifically the non-programmed behaviour

look for "floating point non determinism" to see how the same program can produce different results

keep in mind you asked me on what I base that I think computers don't only do what they are programmed to do

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 minutes ago

You know, acting like a dickhead doesn’t really strengthen your argument.

I’ll speak to someone less pompous about this