this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
830 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (5 children)

If he died of natural causes, what makes you think that’s how the White House would report it. They’d say he was killed and use it to create a false divisive narrative, blaming some left wing conspiracy or assassin who doesn’t exist. They’d use it to galvanise maga behind Vance blah blah blah…

[–] jankforlife@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No that would be to competent for them, they're gonna weekend at bernie him

[–] deepfriedchril@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I feel we might even get a "Weekend at Bernie's" situation.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly my thoughts.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Even if they don't explicitly say it (which they will), the MAGA hordes will concoct their own conspiracy theories and believe them. After all, they are all QAnon alumni.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But without Trump himself directing it, they won't be able to focus that rage, it will quickly divest into the thousand little in-groups of conspiracies, backwoods nutcases screaming into the void, random nuts in trucks driving into drugstores and shooting up pizza places.

It will be chaotic sure, but it will have no cohesion. Half the people around Trump are just there to pick up his crumbs of power, the other half are delusional enough to think they have the unique charm to take his place.

When Trump dies, there won't be leadership in the republican party. They're making an effort with Vance by parading him around more and more, but the right doesn't like him. He talks too much, he sounds like a politician.

Honestly, the only person who could have possibly taken pole position and started rallying the right under his own brand of conservative charisma was Charlie Kirk. No wonder the right is so bent out of shape about it.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You hit the nail on the head re: Vance.

The cushion connoisseur occasionally pretends to give a shit about working class people (even though he doesn’t). MAGAts want their faces brazenly spat on, because they’re temporarily embarrassed billionaires and being poor makes you worthless*.

I shudder at the thought of a Kirk-led timeline though, so thank you for the silver lining.

*according to them.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they won’t be able to focus that rage, it will quickly divest into the thousand little in-groups of conspiracies, backwoods nutcases screaming into the void, random nuts in trucks driving into drugstores and shooting up pizza places.

Curious how many will assume Vance poisoned him to become president or something like that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It would be pretty easy to start pre-seeding this idea with memes and the like.

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Look, I'm not saying that Vance has been poisoning Trump to take over, I'm just saying we all know he's capable of it. Of course we should wait till the investigation into Vance reports their findings before jumping to conclusions, but come on, everyone knows it's entirely plausible.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Look, I get that "Royal Food Tasters" were a relic of medieval days, but don't you think the great kings of the past had them for a reason? Isn't it curious that every time we brought it up, Vance's team shot the idea down before Trump was even able consider it?

It's just things to think about, I'm not saying it's what happened.