this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
426 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31167 readers
2147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All politics are identity politics. Republicans have long mocked this notion, treating the very concept of “identity politics” as a left-wing fixation. In reality, the GOP’s success is entirely due to the cheapest form of identity politics: For decades, but especially now, they have worked to distract voters from the party’s ruinous policies with appeals to their identity as white, provincial and, most importantly, Christian. This campaign has been enormously successful. White evangelicals have been the backbone of the GOP for decades not because they love tax cuts for the rich and environmental degradation, but because they have been told, repeatedly, that Democrats are demonic and there is no such thing as a liberal Christian.

This is why there’s a growing panic in the Republican ranks over the campaign of James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, and it’s not just fear that he could beat Ken Paxton, the state’s Republican attorney general. Win or lose, Talarico — a seminary student-turned-politician — embodies an existential threat to the right’s long-standing myth that to be Christian must necessarily mean voting Republican.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You can't follow teachings of Jesus and be a Republican.

Christ said to pay your taxes, that hoarding wealth is a sin, and he flipped shit (and tables) over the commercialization of faith in the temple.

He threatens Hell one time (Matthew 25), and it's for the mistreatment of the poor, hungry, sick, imprisoned, and foreigners.

[–] ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My parents are very strong, theologically conservative Christians and vote Republican. I say "vote Republican" because they're not invested in the machinery and drama around Republican politics. They don't attend conventions or rallys. They don't watch Fox new or follow the 24 hour news cycle. They're not at all wealthy but are comfortable (through frugal living) and they take advantage of public programs. They are essentially single-issue voters - abortion. I'm 95% sure that if the parties magically switched positions and Democrats were pro-life and Republican pro-choice, my parents would start voting Democrat.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 32 minutes ago

The Republicans' entire existence is due to 2 single-issue voting groups. Pro-Life and Pro-gun.

[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who, unfortunately, needs to interact with a lot of American "Christians", it cannot be understated how little of Christ's own words are spoken in most Protestant churches.

Years of going to church with my wife's family and I've heard Romans or Timothy 2 dozens of times but I can't remember the last time I heard anything from the gospels that were actually Jesus' words vice an apostle.

Sunday school is worse. Kids learn Old testament -> brief synopsis of Jesus, mostly John (should be obvious by now why) -> and then wrote memorize Paul.

Christians in America generally avoid Christ as much as possible.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I remember Robert Anton Wilson, who grew up Catholic, musing about how they should probably be called Paulians. Man, did that hit home with my experience.

I grew up xtian (from a liberal tradition of xtianity) and when I started hearing how other kids that were also xtian talking about certain issues, as early as maybe third or fourth grade I started to understand that there are vastly different interpretations of what that means.

I read the NT at a rather early age, slogged through the OT later, 2x for both of them (although I admit to skimming Numbers) and that did a lot to generally give me a great distance from all of it.

When hard core wingers talk about "the bible", I often get the sense they have never read anything but hand-selected passages spoon-fed to them. It is especially wild to notice that when I talk about "red letter xtians" around them they often get a look of confusion. Before the term was concocted, though, even as an adolescent, when I'd ask people if what they were espousing was something that was written in red, they'd be confused. Which is strange, since quite a few bibles I've seen have Jesus' words in red...

When this same batch of illiterates advocate for "teaching the bible", part of me wants to say - yes, let's do that, but read the entire thing and have class discussions after each assigned reading.

No special guidance, though, from certain beliefs. No apologetics applied to "explain" all the contradictions with logic, math, science and ethics. Start to finish, baby, even if it takes a few years to do it.

See how long that lasts, LOL.