this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
140 points (87.2% liked)

politics

31283 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trans journalist Erin Reed has published a list of Democratic midterm candidates with anti-trans records, and the question she is forcing is one the party would rather not answer: if trans voters keep rewarding Democrats who harm them, what signal does that send? The calculation is real, the stakes are high, and there is no clean answer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not actual elected representatives lying to us on the campaign trail and doing the exact opposite in the capital?

Remember the twenty ratfuckers who lined up to tell us they all had "the same policies as Bernie, but BETTER"????

It was the voters fault all along. Who would have guessed. Fuck me, right?

[–] starik@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We got to vote for Bernie in the primary. Not enough people chose him over the “safer”, more conservative Biden (who definitely wasn’t advertised as having the same policies as Bernie). Biden was still way better than Trump, so we should have voted for him in the general. This isn’t complicated.

[–] LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Think about it.

Biden was prematurely flung into the nomination on the eve of a pandemic in South Carolina. South Carolina's electorate is made up of overwhelmingly Republican voting conservatives. They had an idle primary with no contest to Trump, and suddenly there's a record SC Dem primary turnout? Republicans voted in an open primary anyways, because why wouldn't an asshole do that? Republicans nominated Biden, a habitual lying senile genocidal racist rapist, because why wouldn't an asshole do that? The disparity between Bernie's policies being so so popular and the dogshit party's refusal to enact democratic mandates is a dead end in a fatally flawed excuse for a democracy.

It's only not complicated for liars and chumps. Which are you?

[–] starik@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It’s hard enough to get voters to turn out for their own primaries. People don’t strategically vote in the opposition primary in significant numbers; that’s pure fantasy.

What South Carolina has, in addition to a lot of Republicans, is a lot of conservative, risk-averse, black Democrats. They don’t vote for progressives in primaries, because they believe (probably correctly) that white people won’t elect them in the general. That’s who nominated Biden.

[–] LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

It was an almost 50% increase in turnout from 2016. In an average open primary the strategic crossover is said to be 3% to 20%. That's hardly insignificant numbers, nor a fantastical concept, and nothing was typical in 2020.

The Democratic party actively suppresses voter turnout . They use the same tactics the Republicans use in the general election, which often overlap. They'll limit polling locations or forgo primaries completely when THEY determine THEIR candidate is "unopposed".

And don't get me started in all the ratfucking going on in caucuses or mid-contest rule changes.

It's a corrupt corporate controlled party that's leading the nation towards destruction alongside the Republican party, and nothing either of says will change that.

America is neither an open or free democracy, if it ever was one.