Fuck AI

8341 readers

2242 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

UK workers spend nearly £1 billion of their own money on AI for work, Deloitte finds (www.reuters.com)

submitted 2 days ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One is six workers in Britain is paying for an AI tool to help them do their job, at a total cost of nearly £1 billion ($1.4 billion) a year of ‌their own money, according to research published by Deloitte.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One is six workers in Britain

Fucking lol, these typos are so common on news sites it seems like editors aren't even a thing anymore.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a lot of workers.

[–] PervServer@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 days ago

1 worker, 5 AI agents lol

[–] TheBlindPew@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Part of me wonders if easy typos in news articles aren't a purposeful little signal to the people who care that the article wasn't written by AI. But then I also think that it'd be just as easy to insert some typos into fresh slop that maybe the simpler explanation of not being thoroughly edited makes more sense