this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
33 points (88.4% liked)

politics

31245 readers
2168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a toxic cycle: The public rightfully disapproves of the atrocities of anti-immigrant policies; in response, liberals roll out unimaginative plans hinged on outdated narratives; and finally, in the vacuum created by the lack of any tangible, pro-immigrant vision, the right recaptures the public’s attention with fear mongering and a sensationalist focus on crime and the border.

To break this cycle, we must imagine a pro-immigrant future in which our communities, not politicians and pundits, get to define safety.

We can start with recognizing that the modern-day legal basis for the criminalization of immigrants largely rests on a pair of anti-immigrant bills signed into law by Bill Clinton 30 years ago. Building upon the U.S. legacy of racialized immigration control, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) further entrenched mass incarceration and laid the blueprint for the detention and deportation machine we have today.

These laws drastically expanded the government’s ability to automatically detain and deport people without due process and without consideration for their current circumstances.

IIRIRA, in particular, dramatically expanded who can be deported, made detention mandatory, created fast-track deportations, and stripped immigration judges of much of their discretion.

The numbers show just how much these laws have supercharged the mass incarceration and deportation of immigrants over the past 30 years. In 1995, 50,924 people were deported and fewer than 7,500 people were held in immigration detention. By 1997, the number of people deported more than doubled to 114,432, and by 2001, 20,500 people were held in detention. Thirty years later, the devastation has only climbed higher, with nearly 330,000 people deported in 2025 and roughly 70,000 people in ICE detention today.

Once mandatory detention created the demand, private prison companies cashed in and played an integral role in building what is now the world’s largest immigration detention system. Today, approximately 90 percent of people detained in ICE custody are held in prisons owned or operated by private corporations.

The bills also provided the blueprint to turbocharge detention and deportation by further entangling the criminal legal and immigration systems. In what is known as the prison-to-ICE pipeline, immigrants are subject to double punishment; many face the loss of their freedom twice for the same conviction. Because ICE can arrest people as they’re released from prison (despite that individual serving their time and completing their sentence) many are re-incarcerated on the very day they would otherwise go home to their families.

This double standard disproportionately punishes Black people and reinforces systemic racism by propagating existing racial disparities — like those found in conviction rates and policing practices like profiling — into the immigration system.

Today, the ’96 laws continue to be key tools the Trump administration uses to carry out its immigration agenda. As the administration’s enforcement net widens to target and arrest political dissidents, families, and even U.S. citizens, we must recognize the role criminalizing narratives have played in leading us to our present slide into authoritarianism. Criminalization is the primary justification used to make these cruel policies all the more entrenched and widespread.

Here lies the danger of not fighting the root of the problem: When we concede fundamental rights like due process for some, we begin to concede those rights for all. When we fight only for those immigrants who have not yet been labeled “criminal,” we’ll find ourselves unprepared when authoritarians inevitably stamp that label on more and more of us.

Enough with the exclusions.

All people are worthy of human dignity, due process, and the right to live in safety, no matter where we were born. Those who have been previously ensnared in the U.S. carceral system — including those who have committed harm in their past — are not disposable. They’re people, often with full lives established in the U.S., who are worthy of redemption and second chances like anyone else.

To build toward this vision, we must rally around bold proposals that affirm these values. We must reject the toxic “good immigrant/bad immigrant” narrative once and for all and champion a vision in which freedom, human rights, and basic human dignity are the floor for our demands, not merely concessions or carveouts for some.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Patriot act sealed the deal