this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
975 points (98.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
12247 readers
2320 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No: the rhetorical defense of rich people usually arises when action against rich people such as "eat the rich" or "steal all their assets" has been proposed, and people say "well not all rich people deserve that."
Which is true. I don't even think a majority of rich people deserve some punishment for how they accrued their wealth. If you have some conception that they should be dropping crumbs of wealth for you along the way, consider:
And importantly - it is well demonstrated that people can become rich through ethical means. This has been shown to be true over and over again.
Instead of just getting mad at the vague sense of rich people "not doing what you want them to do," reach out and create dialogue with them to lay out your vision for society. Nobody wants to give away money without thinking it will be used effectively.
We should call them SpaceX fanboys because they're two different things, really. People support SpaceX because it has been the most technologically successful rocket launching in enterprise in history and is the best bet at space colonisation for its high level or organisation no massive amounts of funding, assuming Elon isn't just a "for profit" kind of guy now.
I cannot imagine liking Elon musk just by himself. He is misguided and loves AI and hasn't taken the time to uhh remedy his PR image. He was buddies either trump. Its like: "do you support the Soviet union and hate stalin" or "do you support the Indian independence movement but disapprove of Mohatma Gandhi (child molester btw)"
People who like Elon musk like him because he politically aligns with them, that is the main reason at the moment. Whether in terms of AI, bitcoin or right wing politics.
It is true for some but for many its just that they don't like men being criticised all the time - or the traditional way of life in general. Those ones do not take it to a performative "let me stay home baking for my husband all day" position.
And if people have the right to gay marriage et cet, give them the right to align with that traditional way of life, right? Even if they feel it involves some degree of subservience.
This is an awful allegory for the rich- poor relations, because men-women in a relationship is a binary. Rich and poor is a gradient. If someone approves of rich, they might be like "so I don't understand why anyone would need a billion dollars or more but i support peoples right to hold more money than other people up until that point."
Whereas the question of 'do you like men or not' comes down to "do you literally tolerate >50% of society's right to exist on their terms or not?
They're not talking about doctors who are working class but earn more. They're talking about capitalists.
The binary is "does the money come from labor or from owning something?" Whether or not they are doing a specific action.
So what you're describing is a grave miscommunication in which someone hears "rich" in 2026 and thinks "millionaire".
As always, then they should say that. No more "x is y" "no I meant chi is y!" debateslop
No; rich is an incredibly broad, general, term. Anyone who speaks the English language knows that. So again, you have to be specific in your arguments when you lay them out for it to even make logical sense
IMHO if you really want a good debate, you need to ask up front. Rich means a lot of different things to different people and they are indeed saying what they mean.
Therefore we should never commit to a "remove rich people from society" ideology because it's just a stand in term for "people i don't like"