748
"Why would I spend time bonding with my kid when I can just get an AI to do it for me?"
(lemmy.world)
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
748 points (98.8% liked)
Fuck AI
8410 readers
2087 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What part of simply asking her husband to be involved with their child made you think she's shit? People change over time. He may have chosen a different trajectory from hers
Same part as what makes you guys thing she would. Basically boils down to, we have no idea what they are like!
We have one data point: him attempting to shirk his familial responsibility after being asked. It provides some small level of support for the stance you're arguing against.
It does not support your contrarian response at all.
So, no. It doesn't boil down to the same thing.
It does, if you choose not to understand that, no problem. We have no idea what the next response from the wife could be. "Wow, that's an amazing idea honey!" is just as likely considering she married this man.
You're a very strange person.
That makes at least three of us in this thread!
Reread what I said.
Understand that you need to INVENT something that isn't part of the evidence to support your position. That is not the same as overeager extrapolation from what IS available.
Hivemind goes crazy. You fabricated that in the same way I did. There's no telling what the wife reaction would be, so you can infer anything from the tweet.
Nobody is denying this: him attempting to shirk his familial responsibility after being asked
The point you are arguing is that his wife would leave him from things like this, which is assuming that his wife would object to his "familial responsibility avoidance", which is the same as assuming she would not object to it. You are inventing the wife having a negative reaction, I am saying the wife could have a positive reaction.
Also, you invented something first, pot calling the kettle black.
Whenever a law says "a reasonable person," my strategy is to drag them into an infinite fractal of technicalities and possible exceptions because I don't know what reasonable means.
Just because you would like one situation to be reality and think that because it is the most reasonable, doesnt mean it is the only possible reality.
Think of all the famous pieces of shit that exist, they have spouses. Why? Because they are also pieces of shit.
You don't seem to understand what the words invent or fabricate mean.
So, because you have played yourself, you are now throwing out wild accusations. Got it.