politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Rape is the new Comet PingPong or Covid masks or Gaza. It's what is being algorithmically delivered to social media addicted goons to rile them up before an election. Bad actors and tech companies just latch onto whatever the algorithm shows drives psychotic engagement then amplify it until it's all anyone can talk about. I'm not even sure who came up with not all men and whether it was in response to a genuine movement or if some straw man was created by the same people who are getting outraged by it for the sole purpose of driving outrage. Unfortunately this "fake" online movement has real consequences as you can see here. It's stochastic terrorism.
Edit: Look at OP's post history. It's almost exclusively stuff about the Cornell rape case and their comments are so extremely "left" that they are trying to blame all men for rape. I think OP is a disingenuous actor here and is trying to sow discord and foment outrage on Lemmy.
Holy shit guys, according to this account we shouldn't even acknowledge that rape is happening because it's just to rile up engagement. Remember, being anti-rape is some sort of "fake" online movement.
I do not blame all men for rape.
I'm a woman who gets really passionate about fighting the patriarchy. I also post about music and spiders and parenting and all sorts of other shit.
This Cornell case has enraged me and I seem to be the only one posting about it here in the Fediverse.
It's not my fault that rape still happens. I'm not going to be fucking quiet about it.
Some things I noticed:
Your account is 5 months old and has 614 posts and 5.67k comments. That's 37 comments and 4 posts per day. Many of your posts involve some kind of left leaning political issue or they appear to be reposts of popular articles from reddit. Your photo is AI generated.
All of these things lead me to believe that this is basically your job or that your account is shared by multiple people or that it was created specifically to engage with Lemmy users around the time of the election and that it acted as a repost bot for the first few months of existence to mimic engagement. This is how the disinformation bots work, they create accounts a few months before elections and build up karma or some kind of legitimacy, then when an election is a few months out they crank out a ton of engagement/outrage bait. It's also possible that you are so passionate about lemmy that you treat it like your job, I wouldn't rule that out. But one thing you are most certainly not is a casual user. You have an agenda that you are trying to push one way or the other and you work very hard to promote it. I'm glad that unlike reddit, lemmy post history cannot be hidden.
For Christ's sake, Velma is well-known around here. She does literally none of the things you're talking about except for bringing a woman's voice and experience to this male dominated space.
Even if she was some sort of organization only posting to "rile up" the voter base (she's not, let me be clear about that), rape happens and is always horrific. It should always rile you up. If it doesn't, I have serious concerns. Maybe you need to look inwards and determine why you're having this reaction to someone posting that rape exists and is happening now.
Thank you, my fellow PNWer <3
Always love to see your posts and comments <3
To expand on your comment-
I purposefully set out to make Lemmy more welcoming for women and minorities after I first started browsing here and stumbled on several comment threads that were absolutely horrifying - men talking about how "consensual and willing" 14 year olds are around rock stars was a specific one. Comments from minorkeys and TubularTittyFrog were highly upvoted despite being really sexist.
Because I'm stubborn and enjoy forums like these, I made it my business to post the articles that I read. So I do. I post every article that I read that I think is interesting.
It's not my fault that you think a woman with diverse interests and a strong sense of justice for crimes against women is someone with an agenda outside of wanting to make this place more diverse.
It is not AI generated unless the artist used AI without me realizing it. Here's the source
I work a really slow office job.