this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
514 points (98.5% liked)
Greentext
8833 readers
924 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't know where this "they tried hitting war infrastructure" myth comes from.
Same with the bombing in Germany. They literally rebuild German city houses in the desert, to figure out the best way how to blow off the roof and set the wooden structures inside on fire.
They measured fire brigade response times to stage the bombing in a way to hit the rescue efforts.
It was about demoralizing the civil populace, so of course it was never about military targets.
My point was that they were trying to pick epicenters that would do maximum damage to military facilities such as shipyards, ammo depots, command centers.
While there was no dedicated areas specified as a military base these types of logistical facilities were still located in the city, just like every city in Japan at the time.
And I wasn't trying to deny that attacking civilians wasn't a factor (as I said, there was a factor of racism and revenge). I was pointing out that strategic military thinking was still a factor in the target locations.
But I doubt you care about any of that, since you're focussing on a single factor to push that the whole argument is black and white
Yeah, right.
https://sh.itjust.works/comment/27899226