this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
146 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

89408 readers
4247 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Search should be a public utility at this point.

But then again I don't know how you'd neutrally maintain a search algorithm.

Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You want the government running search?! That's an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

Here in Florida, "homosexual teen" would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor's mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I'm actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. "Trannie" would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

[–] walden@wetshav.ing 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

I imagine there'd be even more bribery if search was run by a government.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 39 minutes ago

If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.

[–] milbyte11@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

the way it worked originally, pagerank. SEO, will never cease sadly; goodhart's law n all, but it's better than what we have now