this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
120 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

89408 readers
4874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Great! Let's teach kids that "searching the internet" does not have to mean "Google it"

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 51 minutes ago

I've read that young folks have dropped the term and now say "search it". I'll have to ask my young ones. Unfortunately, they often answer in ways they think daddy wants to hear, despite my admonitions to stop that shit.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

This will backfire hard. It will create students who do not conflate Google with search.

Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the middle of making a big mistake.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 44 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

DuckDuckGo

You are foolish for not using that by now.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 50 minutes ago

And yes, DDG is Bing results, we know.

[–] original_charles@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Maybe "naïve" or "ill informed". "Foolish" is pretty harsh.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 3 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

Foolish is accurate.

Anyone supporting Google, Meta, Musk, Anthropic, Amazon, etc are fools.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 59 minutes ago

The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where people assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

To me the title reads as, "Allow us to abuse you or we wont let you be abused by us".

In other words the best solution is to reject both anyway, Fuck ai.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 50 minutes ago

“Be Evil”

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Good, keep shooting your self.
Schools all across the world are rejecting AI, this will open the road for alternative search engines.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Another commenter said that the IT admin would simply change the search engine behind the omnibar. Easy money and nothing really changes except the kids betting better search results.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago

Kids shouldn't gamble.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 hour ago

Don't be Evil...be nice to those quarterly reports.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 58 minutes ago

You promise?

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Search should be a public utility at this point.

But then again I don't know how you'd neutrally maintain a search algorithm.

Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

You want the government running search?! That's an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

Here in Florida, "homosexual teen" would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor's mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I'm actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. "Trannie" would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 7 minutes ago

At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

[–] milbyte11@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

the way it worked originally, pagerank. SEO, will never cease sadly; goodhart's law n all, but it's better than what we have now

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

google: ai summaries are hurting our advertisement revenue

also google: we'll block you if you reject our ai

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

As someone else pointed out, the IT admin will just change the search engine behind the omnibar. Speaking as a sysadmin, I wouldn't put up with a broken search bar, I'd simply fix it. Hell, even consumers have the power to change it in Chrome!

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

DuckDuckGo and Startpage are the way

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 47 minutes ago

Had to switch to DDG on my phone. I rarely browse the internet that way, but when I was sitting in my flea market booth the ads were fucking unbearable.

[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 2 points 56 minutes ago
[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 2 points 56 minutes ago