this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

memes

20456 readers
1753 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah exactly. Normal inheritance means their kids or spouse inherit, and the number of billionaires remains the same.

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact, if I were to inherit the wealth of a billionaire family member who was shot in public I’d get philanthropic real fast!

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many people say this. However of those who talk the talk, barely any ever walk the walk.

However I think if you are born an heir to a billionaire, you'd lack the perspective which might foster selfless philanthropy.

I'd like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

self preservation isn't a selfless motive, but if it results in philanthropy then that's a win.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly! If billionaires were put in a a position where they need to stop being billionaires and distribute their wealth or else people will kill them, they'd distribute their wealth real fucking fast