this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
580 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2306 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, revenue certainly wouldn't be the same. As in, there would be no revenue.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Ad revenue. They'd still get sales through their store, as well as sponsor revenue.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 8 hours ago

When I worked with an influencer who made free workout vids, his entire revenue was 80% of income. It was an extreme minority from free videos to buying something in his store.

Then some algorithm change in 2018 broke his entire income, he couldn't afford me, and last I checked, he was sponsored by diet pills or whatever fake garbage.

It's a damn shame because his dream was always to provide free workout vids.

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

People with enough of a viewership would still be offered sponsorship for videos. Like YouTubers who do their own ads in videos.