this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
231 points (96.0% liked)

politics

31134 readers
3244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Governor Gavin Newsom holds an early edge over Vice President JD Vance among young male voters for the 2028 presidency, according to new polling from a Republican-affiliated firm.

The latest League of American Workers/TIPP survey, conducted October 22-28, shows that among young men, 38 percent would vote for Newsom compared to 33 percent for Vance.

The findings suggest that Newsom—a prominent Democratic voice—continues to outperform expectations with a demographic that has trended toward the GOP in recent years. The results come amid renewed debate within both parties over how to win back young men, a group increasingly seen as pivotal to future national elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He'll nit support cost of living, depressed wages, and will continue to offer tax breaks to the wealthy. Maybe he throws LGB people a bone, but he will absolutely make sure trans people get shafted. He's a corporate Dem when what the Dems actually need to be doing to helping working people.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is this all based on things he’s actually done as a governor or proposed? Or just the vibes he puts out?

As for giving trans people the shaft. I think this is just exaggerations people make online. He came out against trans athletes joining sports of their gender. But that’s an issue 66% of Americans agree with. It hardly means he doesn’t support trans people.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The trans issue shows he's not up for the challenge. If he can't stay on message and has to spread disinformation to win then he is only going to sweep MAGA under the rug instead of addressing their lies head on.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What disinformation did he spread? Maybe I missed that. He actually calls Charlie Kirk out for disinformation he was spreading.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He’s also brought podcast bros onto his own podcast which is already a weird thing for my politicians to be doing while elected as an official representative.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

Times are changing. The podcast bros are affecting politics, so is reasonable for a politician to talk to them. He’s not acting like them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

listen to him talk about the students that have been protesting the genocide, he casts it as antisemitic.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Was this on a podcast? Or somewhere else? I haven’t seen this.

Is this a case where he was calling out specific cases of antisemitism and people responded by claiming he was calling all protests antisemitic?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago

I'm talking about this bill in particular:

https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/10/school-antisemitism-bill-signed/

Then later he gets asked about the AIPAC money he receives and he responds "well that's interesting you ask that" as if the question itself is antisemitic. https://youtu.be/SB-C6QeNyHw