this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
251 points (93.1% liked)

politics

31105 readers
2102 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Taking campaign advice from her brother in law, the CLO of Uber, who is a big part of the gig economy which destroys workers rights, was also a huge red flag.

I still voted for her, but it was like choosing a shit sandwich over Hitler. I didn't exactly want either one.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Both her husband and her campaign manager (her brother in law) are hard core zionists who pushed Harris to ditch the left. What those two wanted was support for israel, and that meant turning away progressives to get votes from the right. The only way those two were 'losing' would be if Harris or Trump won + turned left, which didnt happen. So they got an acceptable outcome. Harris chose her allies (and husband) badly.

I cant imagine a dem ever winning a pro genocide, anti american worker campaign, can you? I can easily imagine right wingers winning such a thing, and thats what happened. Republican voters will cheerfully turn out to harm people--- and dems a bit less so. Some of you think thats a problem, and I dont think it is. I'm glad we're not a party that wins based on embracing mass murder and war crimes.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, she also was going on about fracking.

Campaign was like "see, I'm left of Trump and he's literally the devil. Never mind that I'm to the right of Nixon myself. Blue no matter who! Shame on you for not bothering to vote."

I dislike Trump. I mean he's evil and is trying to erase me.

But I hate Kamala. Because betrayal cuts deeper.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I get it, but bro I'll eat an entire shit deli before Hitler.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Sis, and me too. Which is why I voted for the shit sandwich.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The real problem was that voting for Trump was voting for Mussolini today. Voting for Kamala was voting for Hitler in 2028. If she had managed to win, someone even worse than Trump would win the election in 2028. That's the only possible result from a hypothetical Kamala admin, if she had managed to win the election.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I don't know if that was the only possibility.

But yes, Kamala was to the right of Nixon. And cranked the ratchet effect hard during her run.

The fracking, Gaza, and ties to Uber was especially disgusting imo.

I wouldn't be surprised if in that timeline a more competent fascist took 2028.