this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
399 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31105 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What is happening?

In a particularly notable moment, the president said that "some of his ideas are really the same ideas that I have." At another point, he added that "we agree on a lot more than I would have thought. I want him to do a great job, and we'll help him do a great job."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] witten@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

One thing I haven't seen discussed in regards to this meeting is that Trump has apparently just recently realized (as of the election results around the U.S.) that he's hugely unpopular and that it threatens his power / his grip on the Republicans. And that it stems in part from how he has ignored the affordability issue ever since he got elected.

Then someone like Mamdani waltzes into the picture and absolutely cleans up when running on affordability.. and not just "uh yeah I will totally lower the price of eggs" either. So Trump sees an opportunity to cozy up to this affordability guy in the hopes that some of the voter goodwill that Mamdani earned on that topic rubs off on Trump. He's desperate not to lose his grip on power.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

yeah i've been thinking the same thing

ultimately trump is just a populist. he doesn't care what he does, as long as it makes him popular and stay in power. that can be seen as a good thing, because it might trump to actually move more on the affordability topic.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're right that he has no moral compass—but I think that means any movement he makes on affordability can only ever be skin-deep. He'd just as soon sell out the entire populace if he gets a better offer in regards to retaining power.

yeah you're right

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think you're right. Trump is a dumbass in almost all respects, but he is pretty good at reading and playing to a crowd.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Pretty good. But now you can almost see the desperation bleeding through the orange makeup. I think he's beginning to realize that the moral arc of the universe is actually not so long—and bends toward comeuppance.