‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
There are incentives to learn. The smartest kids do far better than the average kid.
Maybe in school
In the real world, the luckiest people do the best.
no way, all studies show students who do well academically out preform their peers post education.
Did it mention and account for the economic class of the students?
yes of course
Sweet
Then it would account for how the students who are luckiest have more successful lives.
yes but thats besides the point. The point is that people do better in life if they do well in school. Pointing to a tiny subset of people and saying "but these people also do well" doesnt change anything and I genuinely think you're intentionally trolling.