this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
652 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
278 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘

Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Students would want to learn instead of doing less work if there were incentives to learn instead of just get out with a degree.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

It seems AI is putting more light on this problem of the academic system not really being learning oriented.
Not that it matters. There was already enough light on it and now it's just blinding.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are incentives to learn. The smartest kids do far better than the average kid.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe in school

In the real world, the luckiest people do the best.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no way, all studies show students who do well academically out preform their peers post education.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did it mention and account for the economic class of the students?

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sweet

Then it would account for how the students who are luckiest have more successful lives.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

yes but thats besides the point. The point is that people do better in life if they do well in school. Pointing to a tiny subset of people and saying "but these people also do well" doesnt change anything and I genuinely think you're intentionally trolling.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sadly, lockdown era students all got their WFH piece of paper they can safely wipe their asses with. We have never had so many grad students fail out as this cohort. They literally got degrees with no practical knowledge, tehn thought tehy could cost to a career with the same work ethic.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well they're still getting jobs and are instead just learning on the iob

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They just need to learn to make AI do it. Then they can do more than most.