this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
1192 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2869 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 272 points 2 days ago (10 children)

What I'm becoming worried about now is all these corporations now realizing that they can simply supply price the average consumer out of owning electronics or any kind of compute. And locking them into renting or leasing access to data center compute and keeping the power of information further consolidated in corporate interests.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 135 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“You will own nothing and be happy”

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That out of context quote takes a lot of shit for something that was supposed to represent a futuristic socialist utopia.

The idea was that 14 years after that article was published, mankind would have such immediate access to services and those services would be free, that people would just sorta stop caring about owning things. For example, since food and necessities would be free, you could go home and print your dinner. If you wanted someone else to cook, you'd get something delivered. But, if you wanted to try something truly novel that most people don't do anymore in this society, you could rent kitchen equipment and it'd be ready as soon as you need it, and you'd use socialized appliances and utensils. Why? Because your home doesn't need that clutter. If you wanna cook all the time, you can own whatever you want. But most people will want to use that space for something else, so they'll just print their meals.

You would have quick and easy access to transport, so why waste the money and space to own a car? You wanna drive? Push a button in your app and a car arrives for free. Or take the free train or bus.

The essay isn't about "you won't be able to own anything," it's about "you won't want to own anything, but you'll have everything you could ever want or need."

And we're really headed in the right direction for this amazing future. Except, you know... Corporations are bleeding us dry instead of supporting us...

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That does sound lovely, but like every other utopia it’s a fantasy. It’s got the same fatal issue as every other utopia - people. A person can be good and decent, but people suck. I’d say the modern use of that quote is more accurate to reality than the rose tinted view of its origin.

"To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem."

[–] oce@jlai.lu 8 points 2 days ago

The link doesn't work for me.

Even if the initial intention is positive, I think this degree of dependency on external services is not realistic even if mega corps were not as bad as they are currently.

[–] Emi@ani.social 5 points 2 days ago

Thank you. This is the first version I heard so I was confused why it's bad and people being against it.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 83 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Holy cow that’s a very real danger I hadn’t thought of! The industry needs a new trend to reuse all this capacity they built, because AI will likely scale back as many startups fail to reach profit.

Renting your home computer might be the next trend, and it could be gratis at first so people get used to it. Why spy on users when you can actually own their computers?

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Username unfortunately checks out

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Aren't we already seeing that though?

The vast majority of people who surf the web don't use a computer to do it. People who do belong to niches. People over a certain age grew up with and still buy computers. People who game still buy computers or consoles. People who stream/create content still use computers and other electronics for that purpose, same with like. Engineers and hobbyists using CAD and other software in creative spaces.

But the smart phone has overtaken the computer as a personal computing device by quite a large margin now. And at every turn companies are trying to make cell phones a den of ad service, slop, and addictive content while stealing any user data that's not nailed down to increase their revenue and continue the circle.

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

with being a walled garden i have a feeling we will eventually see phones become genuinely free because you will not have an option to keep your data away from advertisers. AOSP is barely holding on to maintain a safe place for users. when all hardware is locked down we will be stuck.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

I'm assuming you mean that phone software will be free, because phones (while they can be heavily subsidized) aren't free and are getting up to ridiculous prices. I own a phone that retails for $1000. That's a ridiculous price for a phone. Except that phones now are just very tiny personal computers.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Please insert more corpo-coin for compute access"

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Hope my verification can still works!

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

theyd have to all collorbate to make that happen though, which is really unfeasable on their end. a BUNCH of companies will go under if they cannot sell product. they arent going to willingly take losses for the sake of a different company.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don't really have to collaborate though. They're proving right now that they can price out consumers by just buying all the hardware capacity up and letting the market take care of the little guys. Hardware manufacturers like Micron are obliging.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the ai companies are but that doesnt talk about the hardware specific companies. for example dell, hp and lenovo run a large business laptop leasing business if they do not get their ram, it will sour their relationships with memory manufacturers . they arent all going to be willing to take losses

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

for example dell, hp and lenovo run a large business laptop leasing business if they do not get their ram, it will sour their relationships with memory manufacturers

Lenovo is stockpiling memory to try to make it through the RAM winter.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ram/lenovo-stockpiles-ram-as-prices-skyrocket-reportedly-has-enough-inventory-to-last-through-2026-memory-stock-claimed-to-be-50-percent-higher-than-usual-to-fight-pricing-shock

Lenovo stockpiles RAM as prices skyrocket, reportedly has enough inventory to last through 2026 — memory stock claimed to be 50% higher than usual to fight pricing shock

Lenovo is playing it smart and buying up as much memory inventory as it can

I don't think that Lenovo is getting special deals with memory makers either, or they wouldn't need to stockpile.

[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the chinese or whoever doesn't chose to do that gain market share?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

The competence can be drowned in irrelevancy, like Microsoft and IE

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I hope it means the return of old, old hardware and the software that comes along with it. This is why projects like collapseOs are important.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hope they do, it will just break stuff more and people will be more likely to go with Linux and open source software. My 10 year old computer still is super fast if it's not bloated.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 days ago

Linux won’t make bullshit pc part prices cheaper. RAM, SSDs, GPUs are all rising in prices because of the AI bubble, used and new are all being affected. Can’t run Linux if the parts are too expensive to even get in the first place.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Software needs hardware Linux dose nothing but make it easier for them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

My point is that there is existing hardware already out on the secondary market for cheap, and can run most of what anybody needs. All those machines that aren't up to snuff for Windows 11 standards don't need to go into the landfill.

[–] de_lancre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Software needs hardware

Can I introduce you to a concept of installing Linux on a dead badger?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How's your 10 year old computer going to look when it's 30 years old?

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Anybody hold onto all their old electronics just in case in spite of the financial/resource “waste”?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No but I do hold onto old electronics because I grew up with my grandparents and they had WW2 wartime rationing mentality about saving everything. Also my grandfather also an incredibly cheap bastards at times too

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Only if you use their products and allow them to profit from it.