this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
427 points (99.3% liked)

Funny

12484 readers
1206 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natecox@programming.dev 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Disagree. Every firearm I’ve ever handled has been loaded.

Sure, sometimes I’m wrong, but even a hint of “well it might not be loaded” seems like a dangerous slippery slope.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's no use reasoning with people who would rather be correct than be safe.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There is a fallacy named after this.

If you treat loaded and unloaded guns with the same safety, you don't have to lie.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Is it the fallacy fallacy?

“I should treat this safely” is not “there is a bullet in this I’d better not fuck around”. Framing matters.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The slippery slope fallacy. Just because you just checked and know that the gun is unloaded doesn't inextricably lead to danger if you always treat a gun as if it were loaded.

You don't have to lie to yourself or others that the gun is loaded if it is not, just always treat it as if it is.

The only thing you do by lying is give people reason not to trust you.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 hours ago

I know the fallacy fallacy. It doesn't apply in this case because you really were making a slippery slope argument with no evidence, and despite my counterarguments. But I don't have more time to spend on ashitpost lol