this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
1028 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9870 readers
2546 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Idk, Tenet didn't seem that complex to me?

If anything, it's decent at hiding things from you at first and then providing explanations later. And if you watch again, some things suddenly make more sense now that you know about the inverted people.

At the end of the day, remember that temporal pincer movement that they explained in the part in Tallinn? Where you send people in both forwards and backwards into some point so one group has information from the other (or it's the same people going into the same time multiple times)? The whole movie is temporal pincer movements encompassed within each other so there's shorter periods of people going inverted, but also longer ones - towards the end they go several days if not weeks inverted so they can go back to when Sator's on the boat with his wife around the same time as the attack in the "Kyiv Opera House" (actually filmed in Tallinn City Hall) at the beginning of the movie.

I'm sure there's details I've missed, and for sure I don't remember the exact order of each inversion and what happened exactly when. But broad strokes, it's easy to understand and doesn't take a superior 5d brain at all. My average ADHD brain can handle it.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It took me three viewings but I was finally able to follow the plot. I honestly loved it.

I watched the first time and was utterly confused, but I was sure there was a narrative that I just wasn't following so a couple weeks later I watched it again. This time I figured out the mechanics of the plot but I did lose the continuity. So, I watched it like 2 days later and literally took notes (like 3 sentances, not an academic study), and was able to follow the entire plotline.

Probably doesn't sound like fun to many, but for me it was an ideal movie watching experience. It provided the experience Inception promised but never lived up to (I did enjoy it as well, but it was not challenging to follow).

I had the luxury of watching it twice in a week (was visiting family for Christmas that year, not a ton to do around the house but watch movies), and I thought that it was a really satisfying film to watch over two viewings. It's definitely an interesting artistic choice to make a movie that benefits from a second viewing, and I can see why that turns people away, but I really enjoyed it.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It’s not complex; it’s convoluted. That’s how Nolan works. It’s a good thing that he’s a great director, because he’s a terrible writer.