this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
4084 readers
308 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No pics of text
Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm normally very willing to agree with this sentiment, but I think she's deliberately under thinking this. Yeah, he also did the bad thing. She was the HR director, though. There really isn't anything more hypocritical that you can do as the head of HR, and I think that's a big part of why people aren't letting her off the hook.
If I got caught going to random sites and downloading viruses while storing all of my passwords in plaintext, that would be a pretty major offence for an IT guy, but not as much for a quality control director. This isn't really any different.
Is it problematic that the CEO was involved? Absolutely. Should he have known better? Of course. Is one of his main duties to discourage other people from this exact behavior? No.
Also, she's the HR director - she's the person employees are meant to come to about sexual abuse. That's a huge conflict of interest
An HR director can't have even the appearance of sexual impropriety. Their job is to protect the company by showing they were not negligent in preventing sexual abuse or a hostile work environment
Who the hell would hire her? You'd have to be insane... You'd have to defend her image in every single court case for her entire tenure