this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
619 points (84.0% liked)

memes

19000 readers
2588 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remembering to look for and ignore folks with that telltale indicator has made the fediverse so much more enjoyable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I don't get it, why is that instance of lemmy bad?

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think the problem is how authoritarian it is. It feels like living in Russia or china. If you say anything bad about china, russia, NK, or the moods you are attacked like you are the anticrist and banned.

From my experience I would risk to say many of those accounts are not even "real" people just a lot of ccp or kremlin police. Really zero freedom to express any ideas or even debate

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason it looks so very similar to the Alt-Right, is because it basically is.

img

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's absolutely a pro-dictatorship pro-russian/chinese farm to get their bot accounts comments, upvotes, etc, to push misinformation.

Literally got banned today for saying Putin should pull out of Ukraine and china has live organ farm harvesting in Xin Jiang province.

Edit: spelling. According to some big brain thinkers if you make a typo in the name of the province where people are tortured, it miraculously never happened...

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The instance admins of lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, who are also the developers of Lemmy, have a wide variety of harmful views including genocide denial, transphobia, and support for authoritarian regimes. They are incredibly ban-happy and spend an unreasonable amount of time removing dissenting opinion from their communities instead of developing the platform. They've got a bunch of people in a complete echo chamber where saying anything critical about their favourite regimes earns you a ban despite there being no rules against it. Their users tend to also be the genocide denying, authoritarian bootlicking type.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago

100% l. Well said.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Racism, political extremism, and kinda just assholes.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 8 points 4 weeks ago

Please tell me how .ml is racist, and not .world allowing Zionists unbanned

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

They tend to be so frothing-at-the-mouth emphatically leftist that they're indistinguishable from a CIA program to discredit the left. To be clear, I don't think lemmy.ml is a CIA program, but I can't imagine what they'd do differently if it were.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

liberals/social democrats tend to lose their shit when they realize that they're right wing, so it's easier to demonize people for pointing out it

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Love the user name! If you browse through the comments, other folks have had the same question answered.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Because it's too left wing for the western redditers who are used to Scandinavia being the end of the political spectrum.

Also, the admins of .world want to consolidate the fediverse under their own instance, hence the constant firehose of rhetoric from .world trying to drive people away from rival instances.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

If you define Left Wing as concentrating all political power in the hands of a narrow elite. The rest of the us have more egalitarian definitions of The Left.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Your view of reality isn't materialist. You can't explain why standards of life have been massively boosted in actually existing socialist countries and inequality rates have been the lowest recorded in history.

The only explanation possible in your view, would be that, for example, 5 different benevolent dictators have succeeded each other over 70 years in the USSR maintaining world class healthcare, education, access to housing, pensions and job security. But these things don't happen in countries with dictators such as Saudi Arabia or fascist Spain.

How is it possible that there are only "good dictators" in communist countries?

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You can’t explain why standards of life have been massively boosted in actually existing socialist countries

You can't explain why the same thing happened in Capitalist countries and doesn't appear unique to "socialism".

How is it possible that there are only “good dictators” in communist countries?

Most outright dictators in communist countries were shitheads. After Stalin died, the USSR had the secret speech. After Mao died, the Chinese communist party made it a high priority to prevent any one person from ever gaining that much power again (which fell apart with Xi Jinping). Ceaușescu was more interested in a life of luxury than in the working class. Most communist countries at most times had a political elite that ruled, not an individual with singular authority over the nation.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

You can't explain why the same thing happened in Capitalist countries

This is false, though. a few capitalist countries, particularly in western Europe and in North America, industrialized at the expense of the rest of the world through colonialism and imperialism since the 1800s, but since the end of WW1, only a minority of capitalist states have actually developed and industrialized, most of them being small European nations still. No fast industrialization with massive life quality boosts happened anywhere in Latin America or Africa, and in Asia only in US puppet regimes utilized as weapons against China. If India had applied the policies that China or the USSR did, hundreds of millions of lives would have been saved from disease and starvation over the past 100 years.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 weeks ago

Man, politics must be so easy when you just make up lazy strawmen that aren't remotely accurate

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 5 points 4 weeks ago

What does this post have to do with the admins of lemmy.world? The original poster of this thread is from piefed.ca.