this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
1056 points (98.6% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, let's ask the person to testify in court. We'll charge Trump with conspiracy to commit murder and then we'll have them testify and a jury can decide if he's guilty. Just like everyone else in this country should have to face.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not how it would work even for an ordinary person. This is an accusation about something rather far-fetched happening 35 years before the accusation was made, with no evidence for it except the accusation itself. It wouldn't lead to criminal charges.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

you don't know when they first contacted the police or FBI. also you have no idea what evidence was collected. your acting like you know something. you don't. yet all we can see is that is was an accusation, but claiming you know when the accusation was made or what investigations have been done is pure bullshit, so kindly shove that back up your ass where you got it from.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It’s hearsay at best as-is. Compile some evidence first otherwise it would be dismissed.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's not just hearsay when its in the context of everything we know about Epstein, Trump, and how they've been named together in previous, similar case(s).

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Top legal minds of Lemmy are in this thread today.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

Nah man, just not an idiot. Maybe in a vacuum this would be hearsay, but it's not in a vacuum is it

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 8 months ago

Compile in some kind of FBI file?

Gosh, we should really get on that.