this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
450 points (93.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

10712 readers
2722 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://zirk.us/@ShaulaEvans/115773818039339000

this is what really sets leftists apart from liberals imo.

liberals like to decorate themselves with the nimbus of morality but when it comes to stepping up to fascism and protesting even if it's not like a fun parade but serious and uncomfortable. Or just if the weather is bad.

Or when it comes to being self critical about your own learned patterns of behavior and thinking.. they are nowhere to be seen, not to be relied on and it does real damage, as we can see.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Did you read the post you're commenting on?

These countries are part of NATO.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NATO is an alliance against external threats. We're talking about internal conflicts. Did you miss the part where Trump threatened Canada and Denmark, both being NATO members?

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Article 5 can be invoked if one NATO member attacks another.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's literally false, go and read article 5. It explicitly says external threats, not internal. In this case, Article 1 applies, which is actually about internal conflicts., but it simply says that any conflicts should be resolved peacefully, not that other members have any obligation to get involved.

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because other articles already clarified that. If one law says "drinking is illegal", another law does not need to say "drinking while being with friends is illegal"

It normally goes 1..2..3.., so if 1 already says something, 5 does not need to repeat something about being exclusively external.

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lmao we have a NATO expert here

Ok, can you point me which article says it's for external threats only?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, not worth my time.

I'm not going to be your assistant in searching for stuff, but it goes something along these lines if internal attack happens - Article 1 is invoked. If whatever happened is not resolved peacefully, article 4 is invoked. Everyone gathers around and reminds the defender that NATO and Article 5 is linked to United Charters, and that (4-2?) quite clearly puts that into words (about inner conflicts), then everyone finished their high end meal and goes home.

Lmao we have a NATO expert here

TBH I sometimes bombard a family member of mine with questions, who's an officer in army that's under NATO.