this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
719 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

9362 readers
1908 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like something right out of 1930s Germany.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You're not really wrong, but what else should I do? It's not like I let his bullshit slide and shrug it off and go "oh you!" I let him know when he's wrong and why he's wrong, and we can still remain friends. That's a win in my opinion.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Read They Thought They Were Free by Milton Mayer. Then lend it to your friend.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You say that like I'm the problem here. As if I don't actively resist MAGA and MAGA thinking. Should I just completely abandon my friend and let him become an even worse version of himself, or should I apply resistance to his line of thought and help him see why he's wrong?

Further polarization of the population only makes the issue worse, but do not for a second mistake my sentiment for idle support or acceptance.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I didn’t mean to imply you were wrong, and I’m sorry if I came across that way.

That book opened my eyes to how people passively accepting fascism think, and I think it’s a great way to understand how to talk to such people. That was all.

Then, perhaps giving them such a book might be a way to give them insight and might help them realise how their own thoughts are like those who were interviewed for the book. Like hey, I found this book interesting, what do you think sort of thing.

I didn’t mean to imply anything other than it might help.

e: also, it’s not a polarising book. It’s highly sympathetic

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

Ah, I apologize, I read into what you were saying completely wrong. Appreciate the recommendation and the clarifying follow up, and my apologies for immediately jumping to the defence.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 minutes ago

No worries! I’ve been trying to understand why people who are completely normal fall for these things from a sociological and interpersonal perspective for years, because they’re not different from us. It’s the nuance that matters, and I think that book was both enlightening and neutral.