A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on "But why, they're right, that's a valid concern." Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here. (1/n)
It's totally understandable if you're dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are "valid" in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people's spaces is wrong for three reasons.
First, it's factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump, just like there were elections last year under Trump and during his first term. This despite one of the two major parties now harboring a lot of anti-democratic elements and ideas.
I'm not particularly interested in convincing anyone on this point and won't try, the future is the future. But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don't find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.
Second, and probably most importantly, it's tactically wrong. "No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won't be elections anyway" cedes victory to your enemies. It's defeatism and nihilism.
Finally, it's wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger's discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn't interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don't do it here.
If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that's fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But I think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn't a strategy. It's selfish and adolescent. It's a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best.
Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.
https://bsky.app/profile/kenjennings.bsky.social/post/3mbuedepurs2x
So what you're saying is that he'd... Send in the military to do what exactly? Close polling places? Any court would give an injunctive order against that within tje day.
Yes, he would send ICE in to close or "monitor" polling stations.
Anyone not white, christian, conservative enough gets arrested. They can beat the rap, maybe, but meanwhile they don't get to vote.
Also, he ignores court orders. Like, recently and continuously
Did you ever think “we aren’t having elections” and “the elections are shams and dangerous with ice that’s all around them” are basically the same fucking thing.
To be honest cancelling them would be better than fucking flat out cheating again. It would get through to way more people than the cheating he is doing. So you can call it fucking optimism on some of our parts. Doomer.
They've already 'successfully' got one judge with ice. Do you really think he wouldn't, one, ignore anything a judge says with full support of all his minions, and, two, not simply get rid of the judge by that point? He's had one year for his lickspittles behind the scenes to set the stage, and now we are seeing constant escalation by ice.
The military complied with orders to commit war crimes, from top brass to the lowest grunt. We. Are. Fucked. They would absolutely shut down elections, especially if it's claimed that they are 'protecting from fraud.' Talking about who to elect is good, we shouldn't stop, but we also need to be seriously considering what to do at each other point as we descend fully into our hell made of fascism, and not bury our heads in the sand about elections being the only (or most likely) win.
Where did say he would need the military? All he has to do is pass an executive order saying no elections. Is that legal? Nope. Does that matter? Also nope.
It literally matters if it's legal what are you smoking
I wish I had the blind faith in the US government you do.