this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
812 points (93.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

10164 readers
3058 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vpol@feddit.uk 58 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They can and should make their own instance. And we can defederate them.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Isn't Truth Social running Mastodon?

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ve read somewhere they originally took the Mastodon server codebase, but it’s been heavily modified since and not compatible with ActivityPub.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Isn't Mastadon AGPL? So legally if that was the case they would have to share sources (if Trump cared about the law)

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 13 points 4 days ago

Yes, and they have "shared" it. After repeat requests, they sent a zip out, and it was posted here:

https://codeberg.org/TruthSocial/truth-social

Certainly out of date by now though.

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I doubt they care about the law.

Of course they don't its Trump, if there was even a sliver of a chance that he could get sued he would pass a law banning copyleft liscenses and retroactively applying it to himself

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Not anymore since it violated the agpl

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Its a fork. So its the codebase which they've modified so it's the technology of mastodon but not actually mastodon. Think of it as a drink that someone has put posion in. The drink itself is harmless and maybe even healthy and nutritious but the poison changes it entirely

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Yes, that was my point

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 4 days ago

There’s an entire howling void of unspeakable instances nobody will federate with, presumably sieg-heiling, shouting slurs and/or trading CSAM among themselves in the darkness. One more won’t change things.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

"We" being individual mastodon admins who each choose if they think the server should be defederated or not? That sounds good.

As for bluesky, what they're doing makes sense for a global non-federated site. Allow anyone to make an account, and allow them to post as long as they don't break the rules. If a user doesn't like that organization they're free to block or mute them. Anything else and you're asking bluesky to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. If they forbid ICE from creating an account, which government entities are allowed? FBI? National Weather Service? FDA? POTUS? Supreme Court? Federal Reserve?

I would bet if you say bluesky should ban "problematic" accounts and asked 100 people which accounts should be banned, you'd get 100 completely different answers. Just use your own judgment and your own block button.