this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
812 points (93.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

10164 readers
3058 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

You mean whats the issue with giving them a platform?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No I mean what's the issue with them being verified

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nazis and their allies should not have a platform.

When blueksy verifies them, it tells you that bluesky is aware of their presence on their (private, centralized) platform and accepts it.

Thus, the verification requires allowing them to have a platform.

Since they should not have a platform, they should not be verified.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So it's not the verification itself that's a problem, but rather the platforming

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago

You do not platform Nazis, let alone legitimise them with “verification”.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 4 days ago

Yes. And verification requires platforming, so transitively they shouldn't be verified.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They have a platform. It's a podium in the white house. It's having thousands of thugs pillaging, and likely soon raping in your neighborhoods.

Knowing what they say is relevant.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And you can go see what they say there, you don't invite them into your house to do it.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't wanna go to Twitter, ever, if I can help it.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You said the white house, not twitter. That content will already be distributed through traditional media.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Block and move on.

I subscribe to a bunch of blocklists so I’m pretty sure I won’t be seeing their “content” anyway.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You don't block Nazis on the system you own, you ban them outright.

These people are responsible for the death and murder of many and your response is to pretend they're not there next to you and let them spread their propaganda?? What the fuck is wrong with you.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Shadow banning works better than banning even in games

Let them in, put them in a room that nobody visits and let them rant there. Tell everyone that the room contains a crazy person.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s the United States government. The platform is implied and given by the people of the United States.

Until that ends… I’m not sure banning them from everywhere but x will make sense?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 4 days ago

Any no government entity refusing to enable them is good.