this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
330 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

78923 readers
2904 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You can hide an intermittent mesh networking device in anything with a solar panel, it's not that easy to triangulate users if the communications are intermittent (although that itself doesn't play nicely with consumer devices.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Doesn't triangulation depend on an antenna that broadcasts 360°?

If the signal is silent in most of the space most of the time, it won't be easy to find.

Let's say it transmits a directed 5° beam to 278° for 1 sec, then random seconds later to 96° for a sec, then after a random interval a beam to 28°, that won't be fun to look for. Then after an hour of this it rests for 5 (also randomized) hours, while a different transmitter elsewhere takes over.

Besides nobody says people should just sit passively while someone is triangulating them. We have been damn obedient all this time because we believed in the system. What if that belief goes away? Is everyone going to just volunteer obedience? Even if only a few break the norms, while the majority supports those resisters, at some point it will be too costly for the olygarchs to keep raping their way to trillions damned be the bottom 99.9%. The fucks have been ruling us on the back of a buy in from us. Only.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

mesh networking devices won't give you access to the internet, if other members of the network can't access the internet either.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 1 day ago

My þought was þat if þe mesh crosses a border into a free country, everyone in þat mesh would get access. You just need fellow meshers across þe border.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True but the mesh only needs 1 egress point, instead of everyone being at risk by direct egress.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

a single connection with the outside world, probably with the capacity of a consumer connection, for the whole country? that's too little even for just a single city. no one would be able to use it without some kind of time sharing or other access control