this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
121 points (98.4% liked)

politics

27280 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Though you’re correct, Merriam Webster makes it seem that “hung” is fine here too.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I prefer hanged, because I don't want any fairy to grant him a giant schlong by accident.

What if it was so big that imthe first erection took far too much blood from his body and he was rushed to the hospital and then they made his wife sign off on cutting it off to save him and because of the blood bag issue they can't give him meds so he is feeling and seeing everything going on in horror as he slips in and out of consciousness?

In the end, sadly, he didn't make it.

This would be, like, an actual djinn and they revel in the fact that they faked out, like, 3 or more times for the same gag?

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago

Agreed. Monkey's paw/genie wishing is a precise science...

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In this context 'hung' could also be an adjective indicating he has a gigantic dong. So I really think we should be sticklers about hanged vs hung here.

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I got banned from r/politics for replying to someone saying that Eric Swallwell should be hung. Apparently, saying something around the lines of "anybody with balls of steel must also be hung" was "inciting violence".

Meanwhile, the guy actually saying he should actually be murdered wasn't seen a problem.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Power-mad mods is one reason I ditched the /r/.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Remember that Noah Webster is responsible for deriving American from English. Convince me he didn't write a dictionary only to lend an air of legitimacy to his lunacy.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've always thought hanged was the correct term for past tense of hanging humans and hung was correct for other situations

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

"Hanged" is an obsolete usage that persisted in legal contexts because people who practice law tend to be pedantic bores. It goes back to the 1500s. "Hung" is first attested a century later.

It's one of the uncommon cases where an originally weak English verb (hang/hanged) morphed into a strong verb (hang/hung) in later usage.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

fuck Noah Webster

Wow, I didn't know that all that stupid little changes in orthography were just because nationalism

[–] deifyed@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago

Well then. I respect his endowment. However it does not justify his actions nor excuse his rhetorics