this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
797 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10164 readers
2965 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 87 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Counterpoint:

If you owe the bank $100 that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem.

-- J. Paul Getty

I'm not defending the US, I'm just pointing out a teeny ten trillion dollar problem.

[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They need to sell more bonds though. Europe can flood the market, leading to a collapse of the bonds value.

That would mean, more debt would become increasingly expensive for the US, potentially to the point where they won't find more lenders.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sure. But the trillions that Europe holds will become worthless if the US defaults.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 22 points 2 days ago

Honestly those trillions seem to be on a fast track to being worthless either way. Might as well leverage them as a loud fuck off to the USA

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can we just add the trillions in euros to EUs bank account and tell the US they don't have to pay us back?

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You don't even need to add them. After all, that money doesn't physically exist. It's just an annotation on a contability book. Just erase it and the debt is no more. If the world decides to "erase" those debt annotations on their contability books, the US debt stops existing.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

And no one would buy US bonds if they just cancel their debt. So their economy would collapse.

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But.. we do want the money they owe us back right? Just not in worthless dollars.

He owes us money because a paper says so. If we decide that paper has no value, we can simply act as if the money he owes us is ours again, since it's just a contability annotation.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this could be a potential play in a 2nd American Civil War. The EU and others can delay or restructure the debt of the Blue Union, while refusing to do any sort of trade with the Red Confederacy.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, the Blue Union isn't particularly great either, it's just the lesser of two evils.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Personally, I would prefer a new nation, wholly progressive and garbed as a Green Democracy to separate it from the old guards. Hopefully, this...everything, has an emerald lining at the end.

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you're missing the part where the US goes effectively bankrupt because it can't sell debt. Everybody loses.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think they'd just print more money first wouldn't they? That would lead to high inflation, and they'd need more money so print more, and next thing you know they're challenging Zimbabwe for the highest denomination bill?

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bye bye confidence in the dollar.

What do think tarrifs are for? They get people used to inflation.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ok, serious question: say that happens and we end up with $1000 for a sandwich type hyperinflation overnight shit. I'm assuming most financial institutions would be in ruins, but assuming they're not, what happens to people with debts? Like, they can't increase the amount you owe, so if you owed them $50k for a car loan, and suddenly $50k is the equivalent of a soda, would that make paying off pre inflation debts easier? I'm guessing there's a big caveat that in that situation most things would not be functioning normally at all anymore.

Like, I'm not trying to be all "hurry up with the downfall of the US!" or anything like that. Just curious how this would play out for individuals. Is there possibly some silver lining for people with large medical debts, for example? Just wondering.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just look at the historical examples of hyperinflation, e.g. Germany, Argentina, Venezuela. Your debts are technically wiped/worthless, but everything else goes to shit, and it takes at least a decade to recover.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So you're saying there's hope for the US...

/s

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

It's one of the paths to a debt reset, the most likely one at this point. Print money and hyperinflate the debt away

Inflation does make your debts easier to pay yes.

I could see the government trying to step in though and do something about that because that would be a shit show, but you do have a contract so fuck them if they try.

It would be such a shit show though globally if the US went through hyperinflation, so ya it's not something we want.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I imagine the hyperinflation will be accompanied by hyper interest rates, just because. That way, every debt will balloon with prices and everyone will be in utter shit, except the lenders.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Interest rates are locked in as part of the terms of the lending contract, unless you're talking about adjustable rate mortgages, which I am not. You're factually wrong here, sorry.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That, and the US is a fiat currency system. Treasuries are a relic of the gold standard. If no one wants to loan the US the money it itself creates out of thin air, it can simply loan itself the money. Really, just will it into existence.

Europeans can exchange their dollar holdings for other currencies or spend their dollars on US goods or dollar-denominated oil. This would weaken the dollar and make imports into the US more expensive. But it’d make US exports more competitive.

I’m always baffled how people, particularly Europeans, don’t understand fiat currency. They have ceded their sovereignty to bond market vigilantes so thoroughly they can’t even conceive of a fiat system.

This particular threat seems like a way to wishfully think their way out of a poor defensive posture. Europe, you’re being squeezed by Russia on one side, the US on the other, and China is hollowing out your manufacturing. Time to hit the gym.

This devalues the currency making it harder to import things and if no one buys your exports you'll have a very very sad economy. Printing money is possible but has very serious repercussions if you just yolo.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

it would be the bank's problem if burgerland stopped borrowing money. Instead they keep going because they can't fund themselves. I wonder what could happen if nobody lent them any more money.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then the US defaults, the dollar craters, and the trillions european countriesbhave invested are instantly worthless. Gone. Disappeared.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At a certain level, economics are just about good will.

If the whole world sees that the US don't want to pay, on mutual accord, we can decide that they don't owe anything to anyone, effectively cancelling the debt.

After that, the US will remain out of the rest of the world without the possibility of borrowing any money at all.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

it takes two to tango, both parties willingly participated in this exchange

Yes, because until not long ago, the US were a country with shit stuff but somewhat reliable.

If you remove the reliability from the equation, one of the parties will most probably stop lending money to the other.