this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
352 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

7621 readers
383 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Looking over their Wikipedia page, DDG looks like they're reasonably independent.

Why is everyone saying they're just Bing?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

DDG gets its results from other search engines. Bing is one of them.

There was also a big thing about DDG allegedly selling user data to Microsoft, which the living brain donors of 4chan probably interpreted as DDG being a different front-end to Bing.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It wasn't exactly selling, but it also wasn't alleged. They made an exception for Microsoft's tracking scripts in their tracking script blocking settings on their phone apps and extensions in exchange for utilizing bing as a backend. Here is the blog post where they walked it back after backlash.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

I have heard about them selling search data to bing. While concerning, I don't think that's quite the same thing. I get how 4Chan could blow that out of proportion.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are really only two usable search engines actually indexing the entire Internet: Google and Bing. Yandex also does but I've never seen it recommended for anything other than Russian language content (the company itself seems to be falling down a mineshaft at the moment). Baidu also does some although every Chinese exchange student I talked to about it (admittedly not many) advised only using it when Google is blocked. Every other engine is just wrapping Google or Bing (yes that includes Yahoo and DDG)

This is the kind of ugly truth of the search engine business. It's a duopoly at least in part because the indicies are expensive to scrape, build, and run. You need to continuously run a large number of servers loading web pages and often running scripts. You need to be large enough to negotiate with content providers not to block you. Keep in mind paying them may bankrupt you as your margins will be thin. Google has a huge advantage here they own a good chunk of the online advertising industry and can afford to throw money around in a way a search only company wouldn't be able to (this is why the European and Canadian link tax schemes ironically cement the existing monopolies). You need to continuously run large linear aglebra transforms on the results (PageRank is expensive). You need to store all your indicies on large expensive servers with a lot of memory as hitting disk may take too long. Results need to be fast and you will make next to nothing on each search.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you link any sources on this?

I think that's my big hesitance to believe it, there just doesn't seem evidence (besides other commenter mentioning an anecdotal tank man reference).

In the wikipedia article:

DuckDuckGo's results are a compilation of "over 400" sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.[69][7][70][71][72] It also uses data from crowdsourced sites such as Wikipedia, to populate knowledge panel boxes to the right of the search results.[71][73] During a Bing API outage in 2024, DuckDuckGo stopped showing results, indicating that Bing provided a substantial portion of DuckDuckGo's results.[74][75]

[–] excess0680@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody else has mentioned this but there have been several times that Bing censored something and it propagated to DDG, most notably when Microsoft censored Tank Man (intended for China, probably) but then Tank Man also was censored on DDG.

Partly because of these incidents, I could never consider DDG reliable.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

The whole tank man stuff is fucking stupid

[–] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My understanding is that they outsource the search part to bing's search back-end. Saying DDG is just Bing is like saying two butchers are the same because they get their meat from the same supplier.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't find any sources to corroborate this claim. Can you link some sources?

[–] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 3 points 21 hours ago

It looks like Bing is just a part of the answer: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources

Most of our search result pages feature one or more Instant Answers. To deliver Instant Answers on specific topics, DuckDuckGo leverages many sources, including specialized sources like Sportradar and crowd-sourced sites like Wikipedia. We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing. Our focus is synthesizing all these sources to create a superior search experience.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

With all due respect, I don't know enough about butchering but it sounds far less complicated than what we're talking about

[–] Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Outsourcing back ends is one of the key parts of being a butcher.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some people get paid good money for outsourcing their back end. Some also get paid for outsourcing other peoples' back ends, but that is generally frowned upon.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

When they're frowning are they doing that at a fur coat and gold chain?