this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
1068 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10160 readers
3527 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Both are horrible to ever exist!

And for the same reason - it can never be a free market if demand and supply aren't both free.
Wanting healthcare when in need isn't really that much of a free choice (demand).
That means on supply side where everyone is motivated by profit you don't need any sort of collusion for everyone to consistently pump up healthcare costs & healthcare insurance premiums, there just isn't any downside.
Direct market competition is financially pointless so all you ever see is mergers.

Oh - and comprehensive national healthcare has insurance built in naturally & efficiently bcs countries have millions of people that pay for healthcare (and no profit is privatised, even better, participants aren't driven by profit).

In recent decades in Europe we underfunded national healthcare providers & are now slowly privatising it - costs are soaring (nothing compared to USA, but we know what's happening, yet we don't vote for it/representatives don't act on it).