this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
1087 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

10164 readers
3529 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He also bought giphy, onavo, parse, ctrl-labs, eyegroove, daytum, and like a dozen other companies, maybe more. Some of these are totally a waste (onavo and parse were shuttered relatively quickly, giphy cost almost a half billion and got basically no roi, etc). It’s more that you’re bound to hit a few zingers if you can just keep trying because you basically have an infinite money glitch.

Also ctrl-labs is neural interfaces. Creepy name for that right? Especially when fucking meta owns it. Yuck.

I suspect only creeps will buy his peep glasses for rapists and pedophiles. They should be banned and if they are not they should at least be like the apple ones, which are basically a gigantic sign that says “this person desperately wants to follow you and your child into the bathroom and videotape it. They want it so bad they spent $3200 and walk around with this stupid asshole shit strapped to their face”

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suspect only creeps will buy his peep glasses for rapists and pedophiles.

I don't understand this. Even voyeurs benefit more from the optical nature of glasses than the camera part.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do you not understand the benefit of saving things for later when one has privacy? More nefariously for creating a collection of illegal voyeur content to use for trade on illicit networks of illegal content

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ah. OK. I'm obviously not in the right mindset.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Probably says something good about you tbh