this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
749 points (98.1% liked)

memes

18987 readers
2528 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The age of something has no correlation to whether or not spoiling it for someone is valid. There's youth being born today that obviously don't have enough lived experience to watch every popular movie known to man. Even for an older audience, you'd have to dedicate all of your spare time watching movies just to keep up with the bare minimum of pop culture references.

I'd argue instead that the Matrix is so widely known and referred to that it's akin to Star Wars; Someone, somewhere is going to ruin it for you eventually and we can't stifle our own cultural spread by limiting what we make reference to.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The age of something has no correlation to whether or not spoiling it for someone is valid.

Eh, I don't know... if someone complained (unfacetiously) that I'd spoiled Romeo & Juliet for them I'd disregard basically everything they said after.

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Poor choice of example. Romeo and Juliet starts by telling the audience how it's gonna end.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, it says what's gonna happen in the end, not how it's gonna happen. Which is why starting a movie/show at the ending in media res still works, although the old "I suppose you're wondering how I got here" line is passe at this point.

[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah but that falls firmly into the second camp of my argument. Maybe I didn't make it super clear but I don't think spoilers for the Matrix are a thing we should be complaining about, same for things like Star Wars and that applies doubly so to classic literature like Romeo and Juliet.

But it's not logical to discredit somebody's feelings for something like, and just throwing a random movie out there, Eight Below. It's not a household title and there's a copious amount of media out there to sift through, enough for you to be able to dedicate your life to movie watching and still not even scratch the surface.

And some people really care about their spoilers. It doesn't really bother me, but I'll defend those that it does; Especially when the typical argument discrediting their emotions is one grounded by emotion and not fact.

[–] NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Personally, I’ve never minded being spoiled. Life is what you make of it, not what you expect it to be. I watch every trailer before I go into a movie, and I still end up liking or disliking it. In my opinion, great expectations are the problem... just ask Pip.