this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
521 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27280 readers
2706 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Which sociologists say "not to bother"? Is it 9 out of 10 of them, like in a toothpaste commercial?

And why do you think people who participate in these things only do it once and stop? Generally the people who participate in one thing are the same people who continue participating in more things. Movements rarely spring full-force into existence at once, they build as more people are affected and/or become aware. Awareness is definitely starting to grow as even oblivious parts of the county are now starting to hear stuff getting through their bubbles that doesn't match the propaganda from their usual feeding trough.

TBH this post reads like a copy of the typical "your efforts are useless so don't bother" propaganda that every. single. post advocating activism gets--there are at least 5 times as many posts lie this trying to dissuade people from taking action as posts advocating action. Gee I wonder whose interests that helps?

If you want to argue about what works best and encourage more effective activities, go ahead and do that instead of just complaining about people who are doing something instead of nothing.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not saying that. They're saying those efforts are useless so do something that actually matters. Like a general strike.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They literally said what I quoted and what I responded to: That sociologists say not to bother (who? which?) and that if people do one thing they think they're done and stop (not at all in my experience).

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay I got one for you. The No Kings protests amounted to absolutely nothing and things have only gotten worse. From my experience it sounds like the person you're replying to is more correct.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Protesting isn't effective until it is. Maybe it never will be or maybe the tide will turn or who knows what. We only know doing nothing accomplishes nothing. There are plenty of cases on video of people in Minneapolis preventing ICE from taking people when a crowd showed up yelling, recording, and blowing whistles, where ICE turned around and left. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't.

Now since you know so much about what doesn't work, tell me what should people be doing and what you have done to help make whatever that is happen? I'm tired of every time people try to take action and there's a post about it on here, you all come swarming out of the woodwork to repeat your same old talking points saying it's useless and no one should bother. What is your agenda?

Either actually start doing something you think will be effective or shut up about it. Stop trying to dissuade the people who are actually doing something, whether you think they're effective or not.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Protesting is only effective because there is the implication that if nothing changes, the people will make a change.

What happens when the powers that be realize that the US people are all bark and no bite? Well, exactly the sort of stuff that is happening in Minnesota right now

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I quit my job and am advocating for a general strike. A method that will have an actual effect. I will also inform people about methods of protest that are ineffective because there's too much on the line here to be so soft. Not everyone is as privileged, or they think fascism coming for them and their families will not be as harmful as lost labor.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You're advocating for a general strike? Great! Except ... then why are you disparaging the very people this thread is about who are doing exactly that, why are you saying "those efforts are useless" to: "Unions, faith groups and local leaders urge residents not to work, shop or go to school after killing of Renee Good". That is a general strike. Even though it's just one day per week for now.

I know what your next reply will because I've seen it many times. You'll say it's not enough, that everyone has to strike every day all at once or it's useless. Nope. That's never going to happen and isn't how it happened in places where protests and strikes were effective. It doesn't have to be everyone every single day, though the more the better. It has to be enough that they can't be ignored or shut down.

Will enough happen here? I really don't know because there is so much propaganda flooding the zone to suppress information, to scare and to dissuade people, and you're contributing to that. If you really do want to help, maybe at least just stop contributing to that.