this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
476 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27262 readers
3329 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Strikes are very powerful. One key rule: never announce in advance how long they will last or they will just wait you out!

In 1920, during the "Kapp Putsch", 12 million workers went on strike and the coup collapsed in about 100 hours!

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I love the energy but not shopping for one day does nothing.

People are just going to delay their purchases. Better would be to cut all unnecessary purchases, or to be selective about where you shop. Having lower than average numbers one day and higher than average numbers the next is literally not even going to move the needle.

The work stoppage, on the other hand, is a little more promising.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah this is why sociologists tell people not to bother with these. It's slactivism, makes people feel good about themselves for participating but has no effect. So they likely think "Well, there's my good deed."

Just the same, a one-day national strike won't accomplish anything, and will actually be worse because only 1% of people will actually do it, making it a joke if the media covers it. And organizers waste so much time and energy on it.

No you gotta go be visible or make a permanent change.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Which sociologists say "not to bother"? Is it 9 out of 10 of them, like in a toothpaste commercial?

And why do you think people who participate in these things only do it once and stop? Generally the people who participate in one thing are the same people who continue participating in more things. Movements rarely spring full-force into existence at once, they build as more people are affected and/or become aware. Awareness is definitely starting to grow as even oblivious parts of the county are now starting to hear stuff getting through their bubbles that doesn't match the propaganda from their usual feeding trough.

TBH this post reads like a copy of the typical "your efforts are useless so don't bother" propaganda that every. single. post advocating activism gets--there are at least 5 times as many posts lie this trying to dissuade people from taking action as posts advocating action. Gee I wonder whose interests that helps?

If you want to argue about what works best and encourage more effective activities, go ahead and do that instead of just complaining about people who are doing something instead of nothing.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They're not saying that. They're saying those efforts are useless so do something that actually matters. Like a general strike.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They literally said what I quoted and what I responded to: That sociologists say not to bother (who? which?) and that if people do one thing they think they're done and stop (not at all in my experience).

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Okay I got one for you. The No Kings protests amounted to absolutely nothing and things have only gotten worse. From my experience it sounds like the person you're replying to is more correct.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Protesting isn't effective until it is. Maybe it never will be or maybe the tide will turn or who knows what. We only know doing nothing accomplishes nothing. There are plenty of cases on video of people in Minneapolis preventing ICE from taking people when a crowd showed up yelling, recording, and blowing whistles, where ICE turned around and left. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't.

Now since you know so much about what doesn't work, tell me what should people be doing and what you have done to help make whatever that is happen? I'm tired of every time people try to take action and there's a post about it on here, you all come swarming out of the woodwork to repeat your same old talking points saying it's useless and no one should bother. What is your agenda?

Either actually start doing something you think will be effective or shut up about it. Stop trying to dissuade the people who are actually doing something, whether you think they're effective or not.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I quit my job and am advocating for a general strike. A method that will have an actual effect. I will also inform people about methods of protest that are ineffective because there's too much on the line here to be so soft. Not everyone is as privileged, or they think fascism coming for them and their families will not be as harmful as lost labor.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

[citation needed]

Stop trying to discourage people from taking action.

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Anything short of assembling an anti-fascist militia is a larp.

we'll just not buy things for a day or two

piss in the wind, go buy a gun.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 59 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

Why do this just in Minnesota? Why not do a nationwide economic blackout this Friday January 23?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 31 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Because people in other areas aren't being personally affected much (yet). And they think they can't afford to lose pay or get fired; instead they'll just lose their country.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's not so much that people aren't affected. It's that most don't want to risk being the first mover. Firing 1 person for missing work is easy. Firing half your staff for ye same thing is a lot harder for businesses.

The plus side is that it's akin to a supersaturated solution. Once a crystal does form, it can grow and spread rapidly.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

Also most people are lazy and don't give a shit.

People can't stop using Twitter - the absolute smallest of inconveniences - to quit supporting a Nazi. Actually doing a real thing, with potential real consequences - is beyond what most Americans appear to be willing to do.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol, I'm sorry, you think we haven't already lost our country?

It's good to see optimists here on Lemmy.

Oh, and yeah, very few can afford to miss a day of work. I feel like people not from here don't believe that... Maybe check your privilege.

[–] beanie@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Either way, soon you won’t have any jobs

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

People only act en masse when they are affected en masse. It's very selfish and very foolish but it's a symptom of a complete lack of group identity or group cohesion.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I'll participate.

[–] Bocky@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

An economic blackout won’t hurt ice at all, it will only hurt the local businesses.

I’m very open to hear ideas that will directly be felt by ice agents though. Non violent ideas

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

It will scare the shit out of the oligarchs that are proping up Trump, the last thing they want to see is class solidarity.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Is the correct response to violence always nonviolence?

If so, that directly contradicts the fact that my grandad was considered a hero for enacting violence on fascists in Europe

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I'll purchase nothing on Friday in solidarity.

I wasn't going to anyway, in fact I do all of my weekly shopping on Sunday morning. But, still.

(Do some people really find it any sort of hardship to not buy something one day a week?)

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Yes. My wife is one of those people. I come home to packages on the porch every single day. Consumerism with excessive connectivity can lead to excessive spending

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

No, but businesses notice when line go down. Panic ensues when the public realizes hyper-consumerism is optional.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Love it when helping involves zero sacrifices.

[–] betahack@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

fuck a day! do it for a week, a month!

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Well, you pretty much continue until you get what your want. So the most effective thing to do is to strike indefinitely.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago

First thing Donnie’s civilly forfeit assets need to go towards is reparations to Minnesota.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

One day won't even slow ICE down. I bet their activities are already causing economic strain on the city now. Need to shut down until they leave.

[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Also they are saying don't shop or go to school. So a strike plus other stuff, it looks like.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Cant use that word. Too communist or something. Idk.

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I think the proper tactic is to stand by what we are. Bernie ran as a democratic socialist. He normalized the use of that term. By doing so he connected his supporters to a history of ideas, tactics and, thinkers. We need to normalize the idea of a general strike.

[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

NGL, this was my first guess why they called it that.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

The trick is, how do you make a statement federally without disrupting the state?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

refuse to continue paying federal taxes

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago

Cut federal taxes and wipe your ass with interstate commerce rules. Pretty sure shit would change pretty damned quick if all trade stopped moving out of California.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 5 points 19 hours ago

Oh, that's easy. Stop doing what the feds tell you. No more federal taxes, and add in some nullification too. If other states like California, Illinois, and New York agree to help out of solidarity, threats of cut federal funding won't hit as hard.

The problem is avoiding the difficult situation of Trump sending in some guys to shoot some people and imprison the survivors.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca -5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Americans are pathetic, they aren't going to do a damn thing.

They couldn't even be bothered to get off their ass to vote.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

SHOPPING

how about shutting the whole fucking country down

Clog every street

Ruin every road

Remove every street sign

RUIN THE FASCIST MACHINES

AMERICA IS ALREADY DEAD, You can't hurt it more than those in charge of it already are.

RESIST

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

How does negatively affecting businesses pressure Turmp and ICE?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

A lot of Trump's power comes from the support of the oligarchs. Shutting everything down hurts them, and shows class solidarity which scares the shit out of them.

[–] chris@lemmy.grey.fail 11 points 15 hours ago

A general strike is one of the only non-violent levers of power the people have.

It sucks. It probably won't do anything. But I'll take this over open war with ICE any day.