this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
4073 readers
227 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No pics of text
Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Having a standing army was never meant for anyone.
The 2nd was to avoid giving the president a standing army. The founders thought that giving a single man access to a standing army would make them a tyrant.
The organized militias were for national defense. There was to be no standing army only a navy.
At the war of 1812 and the Civil War it transmogrified into "kill tyrants" rather than its origin which was "don't make more tyrants."
So any talk of the 2nd at this point is meaningless marketing drivel for the gun and bullet industries and the "people that like to shoot people" industries.