this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
1193 points (93.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10759 readers
2835 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RibbidRabbid@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

none have come up with any particular use for this concept that isn't just as well or better served by a different approach

This is literally the fault of the banks and billionaires controlling them. This is exactly what they want you to believe.

They'd go bankrupt if people started keeping their money on a blockchain and they will do anything possible to prevent that and push the propaganda in the oop post.

While it's partially true, banks and billionaires are much more toxic to this planet and people.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Money and capitalism are toxic to the planet. You cannot have an economic system based on infinite growth when you live on a planet with finite resources and ecological limits. Blockchain enabling* a "better" way to spend money doesn't change the fact that money is still a disease.

[–] Paulemeister@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Money is just a metric to compare different things, don't see how that intrinsically is evil. On capitalism we agree.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

In general, I get it, but the weird thing about arbitrary number as currency is that you can have 'infinite growth' because the numbers are made up and if the number decreases in value by about 2%, then stable value would look like abotu 2% growth.

So you can't have infinite growth in real terms, but we can play this currency game to pretend stable value is growth. Of course, merely keeping pace with inflation is not considered good enough, so they do tend to want to push 'infinite real growth' which is impossible, but if they settle for 'kept pace with inflation but still say growth', that can work because of this shared hallucination that is money...

[–] JabbaTheThott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what are the good uses for this tech then? That was the main point you disagreed with but didn't provide ant examples

[–] RibbidRabbid@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Read other comments, there are plenty. I'm lazy to parrot what was already said by others.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We don't need to boil the Earth to fix late stage capitalism.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We dont need to boil the earth to have crypto either. It's crypto speculators that are the problem latching onto these old systems for nothing but speculative value.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The thing is that if it could have been a way to 'fix capitalism' but instead gets 'broken by' capitalism, then it doesn't provide the proposed value in that respect.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I would have used "incorporated into" or co-opted by, but yeah I agree with you essentially, it's why we can't have nice things.

Its not that it couldn't be useful to some, its just that once you scale to the masses there is clearly nothing to stop it from just being used as another capitalism tool. There are very cool projects that never gained popularity that have anti capitalism baked into it, such as chains with negative interest rates that scale with the amount of coin you have.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The one thing people are doing is piling a whole bunch of money 'on a blockchain'. That use case is very much alive and all the problems it has on that front are precisely due to the nature of a blockchain in an economic context. Wildly varying valuation day to day, massive resource usage for relatively small volume of transactions, low throughput of transactions, a ledger that lets everyone know your financial activities.