this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
357 points (98.1% liked)

politics

27908 readers
2903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 110 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Biden wasn't in the Epstein files.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah but Biden also didn't make sure to choose an AG to actually put the motherfuckers in the Epstein files behind bars, either. It's not like the Epstein information magically appeared when Trump became President, he literally ran in 2024 on the fact that Democrats hadn't released the files. This information was available when Biden was President. Epstein was (very likely) murdered while Trump was President the first time.

So, fuck Biden anyway, he was focusing on all this "decorum" shit when it comes to a fucking network of pedophiles and rampant corruption and oops didn't want to make it "lOoK PoLiTiCaL" to go after criminality. Now the same people they didn't want to look political prosecuting don't give one single fuck about looking political in prosecuting their perceived enemies.

Fuck, Biden was literally handed a free pass when the Supreme Court ruled that when a President does it, it's not a illegal. He could have done any number of things to prevent this with the backing of a Supreme Court decision that was tailored to support Trump but technically applied to any President.

Democrats may not be in the files, but they sat on their fucking asses writing strongly worded letters and throwing up their hands going "but it's too hard to make sure they go down! Gears of justice turn slowly, so slowly that Trump can be voted back into office even with all this hanging over him!"

It's a crock of shit, Democrats are culpable for not taking this fight to the mat and instead being wishy washy limp dicks who handed over the reigns of the government to corruption twice in a row.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeeeepppp the controlled opposition party made sure to protect their billionaires

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

controlled ~~opposition~~ party made sure to protect their billionaires

The actions of the Democratic party don't even warrant the term. Look at Schumers and Jefferies response to the literal kidnapping of a sovereign head of state. They were basically mad Trump didn't do the right paper work, but fully supported the action.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 89 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Biden wasn't a traitor. He also didn't bankrupt a casino

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Biden had all kinds of programs that looked out for US citizens and built up our healthcare and education.

[–] bibbasa@piefed.social 20 points 4 hours ago

biden also had all kinds of programs that specifically helped rural people who voted for trump. the chips act brought battery factories (now cancelled thanks to tariffs) AND his infrastructure bill that is bringing high speed internet to rural country right now.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

To run a successful casino, you need to make your customers feel like they’re winning and you’re losing. Trump is incapable of that.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Aybody defending another country more than their own is a traitor

[–] pwalshj@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Waaaaiiiit. Mr. Burns did those things too!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Biden didn't shit himself during a press conference.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There were at least two "Biden pooped themselves" incidents. One was the DDay memorial. The second was an audience with the pope.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly don't even care if our president accidentally shits themselves. I mean, it happens.

What I do care about is if our president has such a fragile ego that they'll lie and punish other people because they shit their pants. The kind of person who will accuse everyone else of shitting their pants, but only because that person's own pants are constantly weighed down by dookies. The kind of person who can't forgive themselves for a little brown downtown, so they steal and extort an entire country, just so that they can extort other countries and become friends with other people who love lying about their bowel movements.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I honestly don’t even care if our president accidentally shits themselves.

And the problem with that, is that other people do. And if you don't pick a candidate that is acceptable to a broad enough coalition to win the election: you don't win the election.

Its not a matter of what you'll accept out of a candidate; its a matter of what the electorate will accept as a candidate. And while you might be accepting of pants-shitter to make some of the most impactful decisions that will affect almost every person on the planet, the American people wont. You being willing to accept less makes you irrelevant; you aren't a vote we need to work to get. Which is fine. Its your vote. Do what you will. You don't need to have standards.

But, by putting the bar so low and accepting a pants-shitter, you sabotage our collective ability to actually get that person into office. It should be obvious to you now, that not enough other people wanted to elect a pants-shitter. And as a cohort, the Biden apologists, by insisting that everyone else lower their standards to that of a geriatric who was barely present, these people are saboteurs who kneecapped our ability to stop Trump.

And since you have such low standards, I expect that you should be willing to accept that your view doesn't matter and shouldn't be weighted as highly as people who need something more, like a specific set of policies or a certain level of competency. We don't need to work for your vote: you'll vote for a pants-shitter. This is great because it lets us narrow down the field to candidates for people who do have some standards, for example, that they don't want to vote for someone who is an advocate for genocide them as a people. Or who want police reform. Or any number of other issues. Literally any ones opinion should be weighted more highly, since, like you said, you'll basically vote for anyone, even a barely walking, senile geriatric, who shits their pants on stage.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He supported the terrorist state that Epstein was working for and that is a safe heaven for pedophiles

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Right and Trump is doing much better than Biden on that front? Talk about mental gymnastics, phew.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No Trump is not doing better in that front , it doesn't mean you have to defend Biden and whitewash him

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world -4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think your name is missing an s at the end.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Biden would have released the file if Israel was not involved . Biden prefer to protect Israel over revealing Trump involvement with Epstein . Not to say that Trump is not also involved in supporting Israeli genocidal war

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Didn’t need to be, he is a full on self-avowed Zionist.