this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42088 readers
381 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, we watched Silicon Valley executives perform elaborate corporate theater about “values” and “belonging” and “bringing your whole self to work.” If you were skeptical that any of that was real, well, congrats.

Aaron Zamost, a longtime tech communications exec, has a piece in the NY Times that should be required reading for anyone trying to understand the tech industry’s sudden, conspicuous rightward lurch. His argument is refreshingly blunt: this isn’t about ideology. It never was. It’s about leverage.

There are many theories about Silicon Valley’s swift, and very conspicuous, rightward turn. Tech leaders course-corrected from an overly permissive era. The Trump administration demands fealty in exchange for critical regulatory favors. Mr. Trump’s re-election reshaped the national climate and reoriented the values of tech leadership.

Each of these explanations is convenient, but none are correct. I’ve worked in tech for 20 years, across both Big Tech and venture-backed start-ups, and I can tell you the truth is much more mundane. Silicon Valley’s chief executives have always been driven by economics, not ideology. As Michael Corleone put it: It’s not personal — it’s strictly business.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But I won't go to those service businesses if I am in the office either. I brought my own lunch from home. So I may as well keep working from home as I outright refuse to pay £3+ for a fucking sandwich.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly! And the city my office is in, is bougie as fuck. There are no sandwiches under $12. These dudes were going out for executive lunches @$50+ per person. They would invite me and I’d say the same thing, “what? No. You know how much you pay me”… and they would laugh every time, walk across the parking lot, and drink themselves silly.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago

And yet they act surprised when we resist coming in.

Fully remote my job is ok, shit pay but alright conditions. Now they move the office 10x further away and want me in twice a month saying "we feel this is reasonable". I am yet to see any benefit from us having this new office, I have got less work done in the office in the past 12 months combined than I have done in the past 24 hours at home.