this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
729 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28220 readers
2524 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP’s sweeping new anti-voting bill cleared the U.S. House Wednesday, setting up a high-stakes battle in the Senate.

The House voted 218-213 to pass the SAVE America Act, which experts have said could disenfranchise millions by requiring voters to show documentary proof of citizenship at registration and to provide photo ID when they cast ballots.

Republicans have argued for voter ID broadly, pointing out that there isn’t much to prevent a noncitizen from casting a ballot in a federal election — besides the fact that it’s a felony, easily caught, and would lead to deportation all for the chance to cast one out of hundreds of thousands of votes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yep. Very easy to disenfranchise many people this way.

Particularly, anyone whose name or SAAB on their passport or birth certificate doesn't match their photo id. Anyone who works during DMV hours and can't take time off to renew an ID. Especially those who don't drive (and thus don't need a license).

So let's see, that's mainly women, genderqueer, and the working poor. Alright alright.

Who else?

I'm sure that a lot of the unhoused don't have easy access to their birth certificate or passport.

Anybody who cut ties with their parents and can't access this paperwork. So no strong family values.

Oh yeah. The millions of Americans who can't even dream of leaving the country who never even got a passport in the first place.

How is this not a poll tax?

And I'm gonna guess that this is going to make mail in voting more difficult? Or perhaps we will have to verify our ID with an app, this getting all of our info while also removing anonymity from voting, at a time when one party is not just hostile, but downright violent towards members of the other.

How about this...the republicans get to have a poll tax if the Democrats get to have a literacy test. If we are gonna make voting harder, lets make it harder for both sides. Deal?

Obviously that's quite tongue in cheek.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If I recall, any state that requires ID to vote has to give the ID free or it IS considered a poll tax. So this is going to put a lot of expense onto state governments without any federal funding to offset it.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That seems to be a major point of this government. Who is paying for all those national guard deployments, loss of renewable subsidies, SNAP, etc.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Crash the economy, which makes people afraid. Scared people are more likely to vote for a strongman.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True but you'd think they'd at least want a very different "strongman" than the one who did the crashing.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

One would think, but a lot of people are miseducated as to the cause and effect of these things (to put it as politely as I can).

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

any state that requires ID to vote has to give the ID free or it IS considered a poll tax.

They're just going to not do it. Shrug their shoulders and say "oops, not enough time to implement it but we have to have the election now" and will get a finger wagging from the Supreme Court.