this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
305 points (97.8% liked)

politics

28220 readers
2521 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

protecting marginalised people at a time when they're being directly targetted isn't "identity politics"

[–] devolution@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't protect anyone when you virtue signal and lose the vote.

Just ask the Palestinians.🙃

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hm, quick question, why do you think they would lose the vote...

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because magat assholes are doing their best to fuck over the election?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Because you, and people like you, won't show up to the polls if this is the focus of the next election. That's what you're trying not to say. You're reminding us that the MAGAts are going to show up, but that you don't find this issue compelling enough to actually turn out on election day, and you fear that too many others feel as you do.

I'd like to see trans protections and support included in a Universal Healthcare bill that puts the entire medical insurance industry out of business. The Universal Healthcare aspect is why I'm going to the polls, and it would be nice if there were some guarantees in that to ensure that trans care is included in "Universal".

Universal Healthcare is what I will be looking for when I go to the polls this fall. While I'm there, I'll support every trans issue I can find. Fortunately, there isnt much anti-trans horseshit from the people who support Universal Healthcare, nor anti-healthcare horseshit from the trans community. Support for either is support for both.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It seemed like you were drawing a connection between attempting to, or at least signalling that they wanted to, protect trans people and losing.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Establishment Dems could care less about trans rights. They just think that they can claim the moral high ground. If they are sincere about this, then they will do it when they have a veto proof majority.

How will they ever get a veto-proof majority if they never have a vote before elections to show which ones who are against basic human rights?

  • couldn't care less.