this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
276 points (89.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

2046 readers
704 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Haven’t you been reading the news? Apparently you don’t need congress.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

People are OK with auth right. But auth left? Oh no, that's not gonna happen. The military would coup the shit out of that real quick.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Auth Left is still inherently abusive.

No matter how much you pretend that it's for the greater good, authoritarianism will always be detrimental to the relatively powerless masses.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

“People” or Russian bots?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -5 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The problem with the Democrats is that they still have respect for the constitution and institutions. Otherwise they’d get a lot done.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 35 minutes ago

Then why don't they take office when elected?

They dont have respect. They just would rather see the other guys win than the the window move one nanometer left

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don’t agree. They waited until they lost a supermajority in congress to push healthcare reform (what became Obamacare). And dang, wouldn’t you know it, mean old republicans wouldn’t let us have single payer.

So we got a healthcare bill that mandated we buy (generally) private market insurance. A bill written by Penny Pritzker, an insurance industry lobbyist.

It’s kabuki. There’s only one party — the billionaire party.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

No, the problem with the leading Dems is that they ONLY respect the institutions. And their owner donors, of course.

They'd rather let a million people die from lack of political action to save them than subvert the Holy System or inconvenience the rich people legally (and sometimes illegally) bribing them.